O/T Covid Vaccine mRNA

[KerrAvon]

Anyway, does anyone know where 'flu went a few years ago?

Attachment 26328

Measures such as lockdowns, social distancing and masks will reduce the spread of all airborne viruses, including 'flu.

In addition, I suspect that much of the PCR testing capacity that would normally have been used for 'flu surveillance would have been diverted to covid.

Hope this helps.

[Eternal Optimist]

Measures such as lockdowns, social distancing and masks will reduce the spread of all airborne viruses, including 'flu...

Except for Covid, yes?

[Eternal Optimist]

I've not watched the video...

You surprise me.

[Mr_bukaroo]

Can’t speak for the USA but I can confirm that in the UK, all testing was pretty much diverted to testing for COViD and not FLU. As the pandemic went on we started to switch to quad assays that could detect COVID Flu A & B and RSV simultaneously which we are still using now.

This is why you see the drop in Flu figures on what you posted.

[Eternal Optimist]

Can’t speak for the USA but I can confirm that in the UK, all testing was pretty much diverted to testing for COViD and not FLU. As the pandemic went on we started to switch to quad assays that could detect COVID Flu A & B and RSV simultaneously which we are still using now.

This is why you see the drop in Flu figures on what you posted.

PCR tests, yes?

[Mr_bukaroo]

Yes

[Eternal Optimist]

Thanks.

That answers that question.

[KerrAvon]

Except for Covid, yes?

Of course they stopped the spread of covid.

Do you have faith in some weird and wacky theory that could explain how they wouldn't?

[KerrAvon]

Thanks.

That answers that question.

It answers the question unless know nothing about PCR and 'do your research' means blindly accepting any drivel on Twitter/Rumble etc. that catches your eye.

But tell me, are you attaching significance to the reduced reporting of 'flu whilst simultaneously rejecting the technique by which it is reported? The cognitive dissonance that conspiracy theorists have to juggle with is one of their features that fascinates me.

[frogmiller]

I've not watched the video as the shyte propagating algorithms can do quite well enough without me.

On the two points mentioned in the Tweet:

1. Myocarditis is a recognised rare side effect of the mRNA vaccines, although the incidence is around 1 case per 37000 doses on the research that I've seen. It's generally mild and self-limiting.

2. Infection with covid does provide a degree of immunity. Why wouldn't it? Spike protein from the virus will engender an immune response in much the same way as spike protein from a vaccine.

The stupidity of the tweet is in failing to acknowledge that infection with covid can have consequences other than immunity. The infection fatality rate is around 1.4% from memory. And there are a host of other potential consequences of infection, one of which is.... myocarditis.

What it says in the write up is

Former FDA vaccines deputy ADMITS that the covid injections high rates of myocarditis - As much as 1 in 5000!

He also admits that people who had covid had better immunity than those who got the injection.

The viedeo is quite ballanced as it does say that the covid vaccine does give added immunity to covid but not as much as being infected by covid itself. He goes on to say that there are cases of heart problems caused in mainly young men that can't be linked with pubity and that it also effects other ages too.

He was asked at the end of the video if he had taken the booster. Now don't forget that he was on the team responsible for giving the go ahead for Vaccines use. He said that he hadn't taken the booster!!!

If you read it I'm sure your legal mind can pick bones out of what I've said through deflection or by denouncing his as he's now retired!