Quote Originally Posted by itwasin View Post
Chelsea were cleared of any wrong doing by the F.A some months ago,however the person who did go to the victims home to try and get him to drop the charges was DG and yet he still remains suspended? one can only guess! at this time why.
From what I understand Dario did go and talk to the player and his family, the media says to smooth things over so we don't really know the truth about why he went or what was said or even who asked him to go. The story was that Chelsea paid this player not to take his allegation any further, if Chelsea have been cleared by the FA, then they decided either not to pursue this allegation because all those presently at the club are no longer if football or they did not believe the allegation. The one person who was still in football is DG so they made the decision to please the media to suspend him, but the Police are involved so he cannot talk to the FA until there investigation is complete. I'm sure if the player was paid to keep silent then the money came from Chelsea not Dario and the payment would have to be approved by the chairman or other director not by a coach. Also the decision to pay him would have to come from someone at a higher level in Chelsea than a football coach. Lots of questions unanswered as well as why were Chelsea cleared, I doubt DG just turned up without the authority of Chelsea and was he asked to talk to the family and report back to Chelsea or was he sent to smooth things over, whatever that actually means. I have not heard any comment that DG made during this meeting that he made any reference to money, I'm sure the press would have been all over that one. So what did he actually do apart from a cup of tea and a chat. Its that comment 'smooth things over', what does that mean, the press makes out its sinister but as we know the media is not a reliable source of information and neither is social media. So is DG guilty of something or not, my view is probably not, we don't know why he went to the house of the player who made the allegation, so its wrong to say that his intention was to get the family to keep the allegation within Chelsea football club, all we have heard is what's reported in the media and that is a totally discredited source of factual news. My theory is the FA is pandering to the media as they always do.