I'd say Dann's recent 'injury' combined with playing Kilgallon in the last couple of games may make it a little more obvious.
Lucas Neill . Its obvious ;-)
I'd say Dann's recent 'injury' combined with playing Kilgallon in the last couple of games may make it a little more obvious.
I think we will sign him as back up for Hanley and Kilgallon .
He`s available , unattached to a club , will be cheap and will accept a contract just to the end of the season . All makes perfect sense . If it does happen I just hope he`s up to it .
I only hope if Lucas Neill does sign as emergency back-up AND gets on the field,he can cause the chaos and panic in opposing penalty-areas that he did for Rovers in days gone .
If he does sign. After leaving us "to play Champions League football" (with West Ham) he should play for us for free.
Will always be a chunt in my eyes.
I APPEARntly share your view on this one "needle" as he has been training at Brockhall for the past few months in preperation for the world cup, I doubt he will play for nothing as suggested by our Big-assed friend as I agree he is a greedy chunt, Now the loan window is open it is just a matter of we need him just as much as he need's us (no pun intended).Originally Posted by needle
Bye im off to appear somewhere else.!!
[quote="bigmoon" (with West Ham) he should play for us for free.
Will always be a chunt in my eyes.[/quote]
I'll second that
as hes just bought a house in Accrington ..you never know ..although hes just a stones through away from Stanley ..so maybe weighing up his options ...Originally Posted by needle
And I'll 3rd it.Originally Posted by "MillHillRover" (with West Ham) he should play for us for free.
Will always be a chunt in my eyes.[/quote
By chance, my lad's 1st Rovers game was when he made his 1st return to with the spammers and they won with that goal that match of the day showed 10 reasons why it wasn't a goal. So he won't be overjoyed with him either.