+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: Ot northern lights

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    22,518

    Ot northern lights

    Any one seeing them
    ,?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2023
    Posts
    511
    Anybody bothered?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    249
    Quote Originally Posted by crashbang View Post
    Any one seeing them
    ,?
    Yes, got some great pictures too from last night. Not seen any tonight yet

  4. #4
    That wasn't the Aurora.

    It was man made by HAARP, based in Alaska.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Eternal Optimist View Post
    That wasn't the Aurora.

    It was man made by HAARP, based in Alaska.

    Name:  IMG-20240511-WA0000.jpg
Views: 392
Size:  92.1 KB

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    4,752
    Quote Originally Posted by Eternal Optimist View Post
    That wasn't the Aurora.

    It was man made by HAARP, based in Alaska.
    I assumed this was a joke, but it seems you might have seriously believed it.

    With some basic understanding of the laws of physics you can realise why this isn't viable.

    First, Alaska is really far away... even high altitudes way beyond visible range given the curvature of the earth.

    Second, one of the most basic rules of physics is that you can't get more energy out of something than you put into it.

    Imagine how much electricity it would require to add enough energy into the sky that it could be visible for thousands of miles.

    HAARP doesn't have anything like the energy generation capacity required to achieve this.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    39,573
    This website gives a basic run down on HAARP.

    https://haarp.gi.alaska.edu/faq

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by John2 View Post
    I assumed this was a joke, but it seems you might have seriously believed it.

    With some basic understanding of the laws of physics you can realise why this isn't viable.

    First, Alaska is really far away... even high altitudes way beyond visible range given the curvature of the earth.

    Second, one of the most basic rules of physics is that you can't get more energy out of something than you put into it.

    Imagine how much electricity it would require to add enough energy into the sky that it could be visible for thousands of miles.

    HAARP doesn't have anything like the energy generation capacity required to achieve this.
    Not so long ago I would have agreed with you, but the events of the past 4 years have driven me down a few rabbit holes leading to some remarkable discoveries.

    I don't blame you for a moment for placing your trust in the controlled information fed to us, but in my experience they're far more likely to be lying to us from a position of power.

    Talking of which, other than taking their word for it, how do you know they don't have the energy generation capacity? (Genuine question).

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    22,518
    How do you know they have?
    Is there an echo between your ears?
    Get a grip man. Jeez.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    4,752
    Quote Originally Posted by Eternal Optimist View Post
    Not so long ago I would have agreed with you, but the events of the past 4 years have driven me down a few rabbit holes leading to some remarkable discoveries.

    I don't blame you for a moment for placing your trust in the controlled information fed to us, but in my experience they're far more likely to be lying to us from a position of power.

    Talking of which, other than taking their word for it, how do you know they don't have the energy generation capacity? (Genuine question).

    This is where you misunderstand, I've not placed my trust in anything "they" have told us - read again... just a basic understanding of science. What we understand of physics is done through a global community over centuries, evidence is presented and independently verifiable.

    I know they don't have the energy generation capacity because the infrastructure required would be so big it would be impossible to hide, never mind impossible to finance.

    They can output 3.6MW of power, which is absolutely nothing in the global context.

    What you believe is basically the equivalent of if I piss in the sea in Florida, you telling me you can feel the water get warm in Blackpool.

    Even if you had the equivalent of the entire UK electrity output and pointed it at the sky, that's typically 30,000MW, compared to the 3.6MW of HAARP - it's just the equivalent of pouring a swimming pool of piss into the sea in Florida and you claiming you can feel the warmth in Blackpool. Common sense dictates you couldn't hide the entire electrical generation output infrastructure of the UK somewhere, just to turn it on for a couple of nights in May.

    It's sad that society has got to the point where people are so unsure what to believe and who to trust in the last 4 years.

    The conspiracy theorist in me wonders if this is no accident.. that hostile governments from around the world have an incentive to spread misinformation and conspiracy theories not because they believe in the theories - but because they know that a population who feels like they're being lied to by some mysterious "higher ups" is more likely to turn against authorities, and lose trust in democracies, and "they" (the misinformers) can get "their" types of people into positions of authority.

    That doesn't seem like that big of a conspiracy theory to me.
    Last edited by John2; 15-05-2024 at 07:20 AM.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •