Aye but I should set of to gan up against a known cheater Tazzy, he could do it again, and we all know youse'll take Kel's side, and scop me out 'cos Kel cheated, just like youse did to poor Kenny.
You'd think you'd actually be trying in the QF not having it handed to you on a plate least we forget Chalky & Ridders didn't take part in your group?Originally Posted by moorlad
Group D COMPLETE:
Q judd 82 (0)
Q moorland 45 (0)
-----------------
R ridders 0 (0)
R fo chalky 0 (0)[/quote]
Least we forget Tazzy you caused chalky's breakdown by gan on about cheats not prospering. Now youse are backing a proven cheater in your own competi
Aye but I should set of to gan up against a known cheater Tazzy, he could do it again, and we all know youse'll take Kel's side, and scop me out 'cos Kel cheated, just like youse did to poor Kenny.
"Known cheater"
Wtf the **** are youse on aboot youse geet cumbrain ****?
I of seen the prove. It doesert look good, youse should come clean and take your much deserved punishment.
Behalf, all youse of seen is a made up message what Kenny said I sent him. Unless you can proof it actually came from my phone then I suggest youse back off of.
Not just one, but two, double prove. There can be no doubt. Youse need to proof youse are innocent, Kenny's prove is incontrovertible* in my honest opinion.
WOTD*
In a court off of law the accuser has to proof what they allege, not the other way round. I divvent of to prof nowt, buddy.
All I can see is non-Daley's picking on a Daley (ok he claims he doesn't care any more but he does tbf). It's blatant bullying Tazzy. And we* don't like bullying do we*?
Don't like bullying? What about Kel and Tazzy ganging up on poor Kenny, that seems to of been an awful case off of cyber bullying. It appears to be a case off of Daleys picking on a bucket shaker to me, and it is wrong.
Can I be the first to say that I divn't give a ****. Ta.