Is Keogh Good Enough

[Rattea]

Compared to 11 in the corresponding fixtures under mcclaren. That's a massive difference then is it?

And then we scored more goals and were more attacking in those fixtures too.

So where's this improvement???

Both managers have minus 1. Two goals over nine games and the heaviest defeat is 4-1 under mcclaren.

There is no improvement. But to claim worked wonders. Based in what??

[rams01]

Keogh is good enough to take us up.we beat florist .should have won at Portman rd .but Hayo. Let's not use players as scapegoats .THE Rams Are Going Up.

[swaledale]

Compared to 11 in the corresponding fixtures under mcclaren. That's a massive difference then is it?

And then we scored more goals and were more attacking in those fixtures too.

So where's this improvement???

Both managers have minus 1. Two goals over nine games and the heaviest defeat is 4-1 under mcclaren.

There is no improvement. But to claim worked wonders. Based in what??

I take it you have been in outer mongolia since McClaren took charge then P rat?

Based on a better win ratio, more consistent performances, more points won, sustained position in top 6 of this league, in fact in the top 3 I could go on but you clearly have your own myopic view and frankly why would anyone waste their time?

[Gift_of_the_Gabb]

So where's this improvement???

To quote the Chilli Peppers.- If you have to ask, you'll never know.

[Rapid]

What he isn't an incredible passer of the ball, he's far better than Shackell ever was at it.

it doesn't happen often D_D but I respectly disagree. I think shackell's better in every department. passing, heading, less error prone, general defending, the lot. not that I'm saying Keogh's bad, just that shackell is better imho.