ched evans again?

[blademark]

Presumably all you moral crusaders believe that no convicted criminal should ever be employed again ?

No moral crusade just an appreciation of how vile a crime Rape is which a large proportion of your brethren seem incapable of what with comparing a Rapist to Madine or indeed any criminal .






*** Offenders are a special category and anyone with any sort of moral compass knows it.
If you had any personal experience of this sort of vile act as some have then you may not be so blase and be able to seperate your support of your club from a former player and see that no matter how good a player has been a rapist is a rapist and deserves nothing but contempt. Certainly he deserves no "duty of care " which
i think is the most craven statement i have ever seen from any company.[/quote]
Yes, but sho

[aussieowl]

Presumably all you moral crusaders believe that no convicted criminal should ever be employed again ?

No moral crusade just an appreciation of how vile a crime Rape is which a large proportion of your brethren seem incapable of what with comparing a Rapist to Madine or indeed any criminal .
*** Offenders are a special category and anyone with any sort of moral compass knows it.
If you had any personal experience of this sort of vile act as some have then you may not be so blase and be able to seperate your support of your club from a former player and see that no matter how good a player has been a rapist is a rapist and deserves nothing but contempt. Certainly he deserves no "duty of care " which
i think is the most craven statement i have ever seen from any company.[/quote]
Yes, but should convicted criminals be allowed to gain future em

[banno]

Presumably all you moral crusaders believe that no convicted criminal should ever be employed again ?

You're so wide off the mark it's embarrassing
For once look further than the end of your nose

[blademark]

Aussie you know I respect your views normally but now your position on Ched Evans appears to be concern for the club ?
Do me a favour.

[aussieowl]

Wrong to obstruct the rehabilitation and re-integration of any person who has served their sentence...but not always straightforward is it...would a local community with young families enthusiastically support the re-integration of a convicted child *** offender, who'd been housed close to them.

SU have to make a decision about their rapist.
After the dodgy decision to bring in Marlon
King, they should expect plenty of feedback.

Yes , and mainly from S6 I think.
But your first statement is the salient point. It has to be wrong to block the rehabilitation of any offender.
Most seem to think it would be ok if some other club took him on, but not his former employers ?
I question whether Owls fans have true moral arguments or just need another stick to beat the Blades with ?[/quote]

If I really wanted a stick to beat the Blades with over this I'd want them to take him back.

Speakin

[blademark]

Presumably all you moral crusaders believe that no convicted criminal should ever be employed again ?

You're so wide off the mark it's embarrassing
For once look further than the end of your nose[/quote]

I can't be wide of the mark, it's just a question. It's the answers I'm interested in.

[Bluestripe]

Wrong to obstruct the rehabilitation and re-integration of any person who has served their sentence...but not always straightforward is it...would a local community with young families enthusiastically support the re-integration of a convicted child *** offender, who'd been housed close to them.

SU have to make a decision about their rapist.
After the dodgy decision to bring in Marlon
King, they should expect plenty of feedback.

Yes , and mainly from S6 I think.
But your first statement is the salient point. It has to be wrong to block the rehabilitation of any offender.
Most seem to think it would be ok if some other club took him on, but not his former employers ?
I question whether Owls fans have true moral arguments or just need another stick to beat the Blades with ?[/quote]

Merits of taking him on/not taking him on would divide many clubs/ fanbases.
I would be very uncomfor

[banno]

Wrong to obstruct the rehabilitation and re-integration of any person who has served their sentence...but not always straightforward is it...would a local community with young families enthusiastically support the re-integration of a convicted child *** offender, who'd been housed close to them.

SU have to make a decision about their rapist.
After the dodgy decision to bring in Marlon
King, they should expect plenty of feedback.

Yes , and mainly from S6 I think.
But your first statement is the salient point. It has to be wrong to block the rehabilitation of any offender.
Most seem to think it would be ok if some other club took him on, but not his former employers ?
I question whether Owls fans have true moral arguments or just need another stick to beat the Blades with ?[/quote]





The argument there is that if he goes straight back to his old highly paid job, has he really bee

[blademark]

Oz, my stance on him is that I would rather not have to deal with the guaranteed flack that will come our way. If I truly look inside myself though, it's purely selfish as he has a right to work again having served his time.
To wish that he worked elsewhere is just to protect my own pride if you like.

[blademark]

Banno, quit while your behind mate. 'Has he really been punished'?
Have you ever spent 2.5 years in prison ?