fao david beckham

[champs95]

Wrong. Jonny Depp was simply chosen because of his American heart throb look. One of his first roles in Nightmare On Elm St was picked for him based solely on his looks than his acting ability. He had to prove himself over the years to get away from being cast 'just' because of his looks. He finally started to get decent roles after nearly 10 years of acting, after he had been in 21 Jump St TV show ...again picked due to his all American school boy look.
Jonny Depo said as much.

You could not have picked a worse example Sax.

it`s well known in the industry that depp has turned down roles that focus on his looks since he was a ****ager..

couldn`t give a sh1t what you say champs..[/quote]

So you responded first, then say say don't give a ****.

Someone's getting a bit wound up.

Your wrong though about Depp. I imagine you know as much about that industry as you do football

[jordan12rhodes]

Wrong. Jonny Depp was simply chosen because of his American heart throb look. One of his first roles in Nightmare On Elm St was picked for him based solely on his looks than his acting ability. He had to prove himself over the years to get away from being cast 'just' because of his looks. He finally started to get decent roles after nearly 10 years of acting, after he had been in 21 Jump St TV show ...again picked due to his all American school boy look.
Jonny Depo said as much.

You could not have picked a worse example Sax.

it`s well known in the industry that depp has turned down roles that focus on his looks since he was a ****ager..

couldn`t give a sh1t what you say champs..[/quote]

So you responded first, then say say don't give a ****.

Someone's getting a bit wound up.

Your wrong though about Depp. I imagine you know

[Howie5o]

Wrong. Jonny Depp was simply chosen because of his American heart throb look. One of his first roles in Nightmare On Elm St was picked for him based solely on his looks than his acting ability. He had to prove himself over the years to get away from being cast 'just' because of his looks. He finally started to get decent roles after nearly 10 years of acting, after he had been in 21 Jump St TV show ...again picked due to his all American school boy look.
Jonny Depo said as much.

You could not have picked a worse example Sax.

it`s well known in the industry that depp has turned down roles that focus on his looks since he was a ****ager..

couldn`t give a sh1t what you say champs..[/quote]

So you responded first, then say say don't give a ****.

Someone's getting a bit wound up.

[champs95]

Wrong. Jonny Depp was simply chosen because of his American heart throb look. One of his first roles in Nightmare On Elm St was picked for him based solely on his looks than his acting ability. He had to prove himself over the years to get away from being cast 'just' because of his looks. He finally started to get decent roles after nearly 10 years of acting, after he had been in 21 Jump St TV show ...again picked due to his all American school boy look.
Jonny Depo said as much.

You could not have picked a worse example Sax.

it`s well known in the industry that depp has turned down roles that focus on his looks since he was a ****ager..

couldn`t give a sh1t what you say champs..[/quote]

So you responded first, then say say don't give a ****.

Someone's getting a bit wound up.

[needle]

This topic proves that Mary has properly lost it.
She believes David Beckham actually looks at this board .
Mental !

[blue_bruce]

Your trolling techniques need a little work.

So only lookers can be considered sporting icons? I guess nobody told Ronaldinho and Brazilian Ronaldo. Whereas the Portugal Ronaldo obviously is sh.ite as he is a little good looking?

There's two major difference though. All of those players, despite having big global presence, never had Beckham's level of superstardom. If you were to believe the level of media hype equated to his level of ability, you would think Beckham was easily the best player who ever lived. Which brings us to the other difference...he just wasn't. All three players you mentioned were far better footballers than Beckham.

Beckham was a good player. A very good player. But I genuinely never felt there was a single point of his career where he was one of the top 20 players in the world. Saxo is right- if Beckham looked like Luke Chadwick, he never would have achieved this level of fame. He'd still have been famous,

[Despair]

I would join this 'debate'...if I gave two f***s about 'celebrities'.
These people live in their own little universe and thrive off attention, it is vomit inducing.
But you guys carry on wasting your lives talking about them

Just remembered (back to footie).
Two good pieces from Martin Samuel re: FFP and heavy reference towards Villa FC (plus other 'lesser clubs'). And the demise of BPool FC

[Howie5o]

I would join this 'debate'...if I gave two f***s about 'celebrities'.
These people live in their own little universe and thrive off attention, it is vomit inducing.
But you guys carry on wasting your lives talking about them

Just remembered (back to footie).
Two good pieces from Martin Samuel re: FFP and heavy reference towards Villa FC (plus other 'lesser clubs'). And the demise of BPool FC

yes good read.. read it last week ..just added the link for you Despair .. - view external link

[jordan12rhodes]

Wrong. Jonny Depp was simply chosen because of his American heart throb look. One of his first roles in Nightmare On Elm St was picked for him based solely on his looks than his acting ability. He had to prove himself over the years to get away from being cast 'just' because of his looks. He finally started to get decent roles after nearly 10 years of acting, after he had been in 21 Jump St TV show ...again picked due to his all American school boy look.
Jonny Depo said as much.

You could not have picked a worse example Sax.

it`s well known in the industry that depp has turned down roles that focus on his looks since he was a ****ager..

couldn`t give a sh1t what you say champs..[/quote]

So you responded first, then say say don't give

[jordan12rhodes]

Your trolling techniques need a little work.

So only lookers can be considered sporting icons? I guess nobody told Ronaldinho and Brazilian Ronaldo. Whereas the Portugal Ronaldo obviously is sh.ite as he is a little good looking?

There's two major difference though. All of those players, despite having big global presence, never had Beckham's level of superstardom. If you were to believe the level of media hype equated to his level of ability, you would think Beckham was easily the best player who ever lived. Which brings us to the other difference...he just wasn't. All three players you mentioned were far better footballers than Beckham.

Beckham was a good player. A very good player. But I genuinely never felt there was a single point of his career where he was one of the top 20 players in the world. Saxo is right- if Beckham looked like Luke Chadwick, he never would have achieved