Reply With Quotethe big differance between me and you lot? i know the game.
Hall Of Fame
After some careful thoughtful consideration I have come to the conclusion that it would be far better for all to graciously accept that he does indeed know more than everybody else. This after all being a forum for all points of view to be acknowledged.
Furthermore, when he next feels the uncontrollable urge to debate, sorry argue, with anyone/everyone he does so between posters Saxo and J12R only. We lesser mortals should desist from any 'debate' as we know nowt of any value.
IM (unworthy) O.
Hall Of Fame
the big differance between me and you lot? i know the game.
Hall Of Fame
Originally Posted by jordan12rhodes
...Your on the game...
Hall Of Fame
JR/Saxo - you must see why you annoy people at times. You're a bit like a politician: if you don't like the question, you don't answer it!
As for the actual topic (and the Lowe thread), surely it's a matter of horses for courses. Lowe is a valuable squad member and a decent full-back. In midfield, his game is limited, being mainly based on energy and ground-coverage. His ambition is generally restricted to short or lateral passes. I don't mind having a player like that in the team, but his inclusion means the EXCLUSION of someone more creative. I agree with you that Evans isn't a true "holding" player, but he puts in a fair number of tackles and challenges.
The answer for me, therefore, might be to have Lowe in midfield for the more difficult games - especially away - but to go for a more attacking line-up in the clearly "winnable" matches.
In those, I would like to
Hall Of Fame
JR/Saxo - you must see why you annoy people at times. You're a bit like a politician: if you don't like the question, you don't answer it!
As for the actual topic (and the Lowe thread), surely it's a matter of horses for courses. Lowe is a valuable squad member and a decent full-back. In midfield, his game is limited, being mainly based on energy and ground-coverage. His ambition is generally restricted to short or lateral passes. I don't mind having a player like that in the team, but his inclusion means the EXCLUSION of someone more creative. I agree with you that Evans isn't a true "holding" player, but he puts in a fair number of tackles and challenges.
The answer for me, therefore, might be to have Lowe in midfield for the more difficult games - especially away - but to go for a more attacking line-up in the cl
Hall Of Fame
JR/Saxo - you must see why you annoy people at times. You're a bit like a politician: if you don't like the question, you don't answer it!
As for the actual topic (and the Lowe thread), surely it's a matter of horses for courses. Lowe is a valuable squad member and a decent full-back. In midfield, his game is limited, being mainly based on energy and ground-coverage. His ambition is generally restricted to short or lateral passes. I don't mind having a player like that in the team, but his inclusion means the EXCLUSION of someone more creative. I agree with you that Evans isn't a true "holding" player, but he puts in a fair number of tackles and challenges.
The answer for me, therefore, might be to have Lowe in midfield for the more difficult games - especially awa
Hall Of Fame
JR/Saxo - you must see why you annoy people at times. You're a bit like a politician: if you don't like the question, you don't answer it!
As for the actual topic (and the Lowe thread), surely it's a matter of horses for courses. Lowe is a valuable squad member and a decent full-back. In midfield, his game is limited, being mainly based on energy and ground-coverage. His ambition is generally restricted to short or lateral passes. I don't mind having a player like that in the team, but his inclusion means the EXCLUSION of someone more creative. I agree with you that Evans isn't a true "holding" player, but he puts in a fair number of tackles and challenges.
The answer for me, therefore, might be to have Lowe in midfield
Hall Of Fame
JR/Saxo - you must see why you annoy people at times. You're a bit like a politician: if you don't like the question, you don't answer it!
As for the actual topic (and the Lowe thread), surely it's a matter of horses for courses. Lowe is a valuable squad member and a decent full-back. In midfield, his game is limited, being mainly based on energy and ground-coverage. His ambition is generally restricted to short or lateral passes. I don't mind having a player like that in the team, but his inclusion means the EXCLUSION of someone more creative. I agree with you that Evans isn't a true "holding" player, but he puts in a fair number of tackles and challenges.
The answer
Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.
Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!
Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.
Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you
The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.
So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!
(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)
Posting Permissions