you're a demented boring phuckpig
"I truly hope that those fans that continue to blindly support the club (for the right reasons) finally realise that 140 years of the club's history will be irretrievably lost unless they withhold their financial support for the current regime at matchdays and the retail outlets."
This is not from 2012, but from yesterday, apparently liquidation doesnt mean losing the history, but liquidation does according tae skelly eyes.
you're a demented boring phuckpig
Lisbonliar doesn't care. We don't matter
Can anyone give me an answer tae this question.
- What does it take for a football club tae be legally wound up and declared finished ?
If Sevco Rangers go under I wouldn't put it past them to reform under a new ('The Sevco Rangers' or somthing like that) and try and get admittance directly into the SPL.
If they can get away with defrauding their creditors and the taxman without any consequences why wouldn't they do it again?
And the Bun media will dutifully run features about '140 years of unbroken history' etc. :/
It is pretty bizarre. If he's going to ignore the definition of "liquidation" the first time, what's the difference the second time?
King's clearly a chancer. The wild thing is half the rangers support will be agreeing with him all the while ignoring that the club they followed is already dead (or the new one gets to keep the history as if it's a goal post or tea kettle or some other asset.).
Strange lot them people.
as long as there is an ibrox stadium, rangers will always exist with unbroken history, and continue to play football and run as a succesful company, no matter how many times the company has been bought or sold to someone else, no matter how many crooks run it or have ran it, no matter how many companys have been defruaded or stolen from, no matter how many rules have been broken, no matter how many times the sfa ignore the dodgy goings on, no matter how many times the club has been up and doon the leagues like a dodgy game of snakes and ladders, no matter how many times the club have had to apply, reapply to gain a licence to play, it will always be rangers, and all conncected with rangers past and present will never have it any other way and will defend robustly any suggestion that rangers are a newco and the previous club/clubs are deed.
there is simply no way rangers will die according to some, they will ignore the truth, bury thier heeds in the sand rather than see what normal se
See if the silly sods had just admitted at the start they were a new club and toned down their ambitions and spending, they would have skooshed the last two seasons, would be going for the Championship this season with a young squad of players bedded in after 2 seasons in lower leagues, their finances would be better and their fans probably a lot less bitter. Trying tae be Rangers is killing Sevco, the ultimate irony IMO.
This debate seems to consist of Celtic fans quoting a convicted tax fraudster who sellectively chooses whether or not liquidation means the end for a football club, and Sevco fans "cogently" responding with
Not much change there then