+ Visit Blackburn Rovers FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: No sale

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    4,327

    No sale

    Venkys have come out with the statement that the story of the sale to battersby and Currie is false and they intend to stick by the club
    - view external link

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    39,297

    re: No sale

    Great News and WELL DONE to the Venkys for their thorough commitment and standing by the club in the face of adversity from a couple of no hopers ..

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    11,680

    re: No sale

    are you being serious Alf? I cant tell

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    39,297

    re: No sale

    Come on Champs you know my views on the chicken pluckers.. Out out out .lol

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    11,680

    re: No sale

    eh?

  6. #6

    re: No sale

    Fact is,the offer was unrealistically low,even for a club with over £110 million debt.

    Assuming Venkys view Rovers as a business pure & simple,no self-respecting owner would dilute their stake for relative pennies. Their "business advisors"would presumably see the option as an opportunistic attempt to acquire potentially attractive assets on the cheap. What the supporters think is irrelevant in this scenario.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,621

    re: No sale

    The post above is correct. This 'bid' was laughable. Equity on the cheap and ignoring the debt. Why on earth would the Venkys agree to that. No wonder these jokers havnt been taken seriously or received a response.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    3,258

    re: No sale

    This is akin to the EU in out ref, in that it will clearly divide opinion.
    I am none too surprised the 'bid' is seen as comical, and yes from the normal business perspective its 'carpetbagging' almost.
    However, Venkys would still be shouldering the vast majority of the burden, as well they should in being the culpable party. At 'current state of play' just what is BRFC's 'marketable value'???
    Now if folk think/believe that we are best placed with them at the helm, and at some point they must get it right, that's all well and good and the declining of the offer is not such a bad thing.
    On the other hand for those that think that it is not going to happen, and the decline will continue, I could well understand them seeing this quite differently in that despite the 'financial' being derisory (for want of a better word), the 'input' may well have been the deciding factor in any recovery.
    Again just like the EU ref., either way is a risk and unless you are in possession of a crystal ba

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •