+ Visit Derby County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 837 of 922 FirstFirst ... 337737787827835836837838839847887 ... LastLast
Results 8,361 to 8,370 of 9219

Thread: OT. The futures Bright, the Futures Brexit!!!

  1. #8361
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    12,983
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy_Faber View Post
    Not gonna happen rA. Not long ago you were loudest of the baying mob looking to 'cancel' DCFCA. I went my own way on that and he's returned a calmer fellah. That's one poster saved

    And yet again you misread a post, You've done that with almost every post I've written in the past few days. Where do I blame you or MA? Nowhere. I think you need to check out who posts are addressed to, your name is ramAnag not Swaledale
    Okay...let’s get this sorted because I’m beginning to think you really do not read or understand what you write.
    Earlier today you wrote total tripe about how I had spoken about Zahawi in an attempt to justify your earlier accusation. It was demonstrable poppycock and you know it as well as I do.

    Later, when holding Swale responsible for having ‘killed the board’ you wrote - and these are YOUR words in post #8355 - about the creation of an ‘echo chamber where MA, ramAnag and yourself (Swale) can now vent to your hearts content with only the occasional poster daring to pop their heads above the parapet to offer a contrary view’.
    Apart from being hopelessly incorrect...if that isn’t a) portraying the three posters referred to as bullies who somehow intimidate others on the forum and b) blaming our behaviour (and particularly that of Swale) for ‘killing the forum’ then I don’t know what is.

    As for being the ‘loudest of a baying mob’ in relation to DCFCA...I am pleased and proud to say that I have never been part of any ‘baying mob’. As I remember things, and I’m not going back to check, at the time of the Clowes takeover DCFCA wrote something libellous about David Clowes that he is no longer particularly proud of. I said you needed to act. GP threatened to stop posting if you didn’t and three or four others, including MA, Stenson and mac were equally insistent that you did something rather than dallying in your usual way.
    Eventually you acted and yellow carded him...aka you followed the advice of those mentioned. It wasn’t a ‘baying mob’...it was damned good advice. The fact that DCFCA has returned a seemingly reformed character is, imo, a good thing and I have welcomed him back, but let’s not pretend you ‘saved’ him any more than, by you following the advice of the aforementioned four posters, the forum was quite possibly saved.

    So...no misreading on my part, let alone ‘yet again’...I’ve quoted what you wrote...and no you’re not some sort of messiah saving DCFCA either. You just, belatedly, followed the advice of others who all told you you had to act along with one who threatened to stop posting until you did.

    As for MA...I seem to remember you announcing that he had offered to help at a time when you ‘having a life’ had led to you paying more limited attention to what was happening on here. You said at the time you couldn’t get in touch with the relevant bodies...now it’s, ‘Not going to happen rA’. That’s a pity, because something needs to!

  2. #8362
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    20,069
    Quote Originally Posted by Geoff Parkstone View Post
    an interesting observation about government being out to weaken the trade unions. IMO they are already on their knees with the growth of home working, the gig economy and the death of industry in Britain. The unions that are left (if I may be excused the expression, them all being left ) with any power are curiously a diverse group who are not your traditional union fodder from the early days of the movement - teachers (who allege themselves professionals) train drivers (who earn way in excess of the national average income already) and the civil service pen pushers aka UNISON. UNITE is a curious amalgam of sectors where a lot of self employment goes on too (construction, transport).

    What we call unions today are a far cry from the unions in the early part of the 20th century or even the 1970's, fighting for employment rights, workplace conditions etc. Very much focussed on maximising members earnings rather than the working conditions IMHO and are possibly going for one last hurrah at holding the country to ransom for cash.
    Your correct in that union membership is well down on what it was, your a little incorrect in terming todays unions are a diverse membership, as if that something new. yes heavy industry, which has largely gone is much less, but there always have been a diverse range of trades and professions represented by unions, although some professions of course have their own trade bodies which are sometimes similar and in other cases different.

    I'm not sure how home working means you don't need a union? Your completely misrepresenting unions as not fighting for employment rights and working conditions and seemed to have swallowed the Tory line parroted by the right wing media about what it is the current strikes are about. Although obviously pay negotiations have always been a big part of Unions, and that is a focus at the moment, but then so is changes in working practices, redundancies, changes on terms and conditions etc.

    Perhaps go on youtube and listen to listen to Mick Lynch, he is both sensible, straight talking and explains what it is his union is fighting for. A little ironically given this thread his Union backed Brexit, but then nobody is perfect!!

    I will pick one example at the moment - Avanti West coast run the London to Manchester, Liverpool and Glasgow trains. They rely on drivers working overtime and rest days to run a full service - the drivers have started to refuse to do this, hence train cancellations an a dispute. It seems to me that relying on a workforce to do overtime and work days allocated to rest ALL the time is poor management.

    Then of course we come to the barristers - yes focussed on the fact that the government slashed legal aid fees, which means its not worth doing criminal law .

    So its not one last hurrah or holding the country to ransom for cash, its defending workers rights, protecting their terms and conditions, and pointing out that the executives and shareholders of many companies - trains, Felixstowe docks, water companies are banking huge salary increases and not the workers.

  3. #8363
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    7,463
    Indeed Swale, 1st year legal aiders get 9k to 12k a year.

  4. #8364
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Posts
    790
    Quote Originally Posted by MadAmster View Post
    Indeed Swale, 1st year legal aiders get 9k to 12k a year.
    Is that apprentices? Its hard to feel sorry for a lawyer. We'll be having whip 'rounds for accountants next! And helping them with cash

  5. #8365
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    6,533
    Sounds a fine idea Ramshank

  6. #8366
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    7,189
    Quote Originally Posted by Ramshank72 View Post
    Is that apprentices? Its hard to feel sorry for a lawyer. We'll be having whip 'rounds for accountants next! And helping them with cash
    A whip round for the whipping boys - yes please

  7. #8367
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    12,983
    Quote Originally Posted by swaledale View Post

    I will pick one example at the moment - Avanti West coast run the London to Manchester, Liverpool and Glasgow trains. They rely on drivers working overtime and rest days to run a full service - the drivers have started to refuse to do this, hence train cancellations an a dispute. It seems to me that relying on a workforce to do overtime and work days allocated to rest ALL the time is poor management.

    Then of course we come to the barristers - yes focussed on the fact that the government slashed legal aid fees, which means its not worth doing criminal law .
    Not to mention the impact of the former on public/passenger safety and of the latter on poorer people seeking justice.

  8. #8368
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    20,069
    Quote Originally Posted by Ramshank72 View Post
    Is that apprentices? Its hard to feel sorry for a lawyer. We'll be having whip 'rounds for accountants next! And helping them with cash
    Well it may be, but criminal law doesn't pay well and frankly if we don't have lawyers willing to do it then the justice system would be ****ed, which isn't good for society generally.

  9. #8369
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    7,463
    Quote Originally Posted by Ramshank72 View Post
    Is that apprentices? Its hard to feel sorry for a lawyer. We'll be having whip 'rounds for accountants next! And helping them with cash
    No these are fully qualified which, I believe, is a 5 year degree course. You can get more flipping burgers.....

    £15 an hour (That should be the minimum wage IMO) and a 40 hour week, including 4 weeks paid holiday is £31200. They're getting about 38% of that.

    I look at it this way, if I found myself in court and had to go down the legal aid route, how motivated would my brief be on his/her £12K a year? Probably not a lot. Hardly fair justice is it?

  10. #8370
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    20,069
    Next year the OECD calculates that the UK will record the lowest growth in the G20 with the exception of Russia whose economy is being drained by its war on Ukraine.

    The Office for Budget Responsibility says Brexit will have a long-term effect of cutting UK GDP by a hefty 4%, an estimate unchanged since early 2020. The Financial Times says such a decline amounts to £100bn in lost output, and £40bn less revenue to the Treasury a year. The UK is now behind all the other G7 nations in the pace of its recovery from the pandemic, with exports by UK small businesses to the EU down significantly.

    Figures from the Centre for European Reform show that the Brexit vote has already depressed economic growth. The independent thinktank said that by the end of last year the economy was 5% – or £31bn – smaller than if the UK had stayed in the EU.

    So there we are folks, all that taking back control is costing the UK economy and making the current crisis worse.

Page 837 of 922 FirstFirst ... 337737787827835836837838839847887 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •