Fair enough, though I don't recall that myself. So "10 or so", and need to be "challenging"uitably vague! I had visions of fans demanding an assessment and an announcement after precisely ten (league, surely?) matches, when that wasn't precisely what was said.
You kind of hope that if and when it's clear that change is needed - that it will be just that: 'clear'.
Regardless, it certainly wasn't half an hour into the 5th league game, when this thread was begun.
A decent result last night with a young side. Amazed that we kept a clean sheet - and with Ray playing! Looks like SD sat the game out and Collins was in charge. Is he next in the frame if SD gets pushed out? Mid-table at best this season and, irrespective of any cup runs, that will be sufficient to keep SD in his job. Of course, we may lose all of our next three games and this will change the perception that we had started steadily to rebuild into a team capable of challenging for promotion. If we are in the bottom five after around 10 games, the Board might take action. Whatever it decides to do, it will not take any notice of us. We just have to grin and bear it and cough up our cash to continue to watch SD's work in progress.
You do not need to suggest an alternative to SD. We already know who would take his place. Would JC change anything though?
Today against Exeter may be decisive - a win may put us in a very good position but a loss will begin to look a little precarious.
Yesterday was always going to be tough (Exeter had improved) and we, in my opinion, deservedly got 3 pts. I questioned the manager's substitutions - taking off my MotM and the Captain, both of whom could have secured the win - and then we go and score and double the lead at a stage when there simply wasn't enough time for Exeter to get two.
So, Steve Davis was right; we are sitting in 6th place; and we have two eminently winnable - or at least 4 pts - games over the rest of September. That'll do for me.