But others were pretty quick to jump to that conclusion, and I note by its absence anything from you to correct them.
Not quite sure why you felt it necessary to reproduce it here in the first place (most have seen the comment in the thread anyway) other than throwing aforementioned sh1t.
Hey ho ALAW (Yeah, sure we are)
Wtf are you on about?
News feed, forum, blog, stone tablet, whatever the siurce, the reason coeman created the thread, posted the first message mentioning my name and no other (even though others are clearly mentiond in the news feed), was to throw sh1t in my direction and no-one else (even though there are others on here who have posted similar "negative" comments).
But like I say, hey ho ALAW (like f00k we are, try finding any of my actions that have sought to villify one individual by creating a thread in order to do so)
I ended up on there through a twitter link. Seen your name, came on here and asked if it was you. I've not posted on here for ages. I didn't know their was a Pacman on here. But what did it was seeing WTF11 and seeing negative comments about Leeds. I know him I thought. So came on here to ask. Obviously your still a massive anti Leeds Tw*t!
You didn't look for any more names, if you did and you missed them then you're blind as well as dumb. Despite HIM not being able to tell the difference between a newsfeed and a forum page, (and despite his clear delight in being able to cast nasturtiums my way), even Tich was able to spot Pacmans name (and he has been around a while, you haven't "been away" that long).
Say again, the comments were made on this forum, I have no account anywhere else, wouldn't want one, and as for being "anti-Leeds", have a look at the prediction table and see what I predict for tonight (unlike others), as i expect a draw, fear a loss and hope despite all indications to the contrary for a win. That so unusual?
Or as you have been away, trawl a few other threads on here and try finding a majority who DON'T feel the same as I do. You won't be able to.
Au contraire, I am more than happy to take as well as give, in a thread, in a "debate", heated or otherwise.
What I find slightly offensive is for another poster, who arrived at that news feed via Twitter (as coeman admits), to selectively use my name only in the first post of a thread he created, when the first name in that list "60sUnited", says "They are too big and powerful for us. Leeds 0v 2 WBA", but of course as that isn't a quote/post from me, it gets no mention.
Nothing to do with being treated with respect, just evenhandeness, but that's as in short supply as the reality of ALAW.
Hey ho, whatever rocks your boat.
Eight out of Eigh**** posts on this thread are yours - would suggest he's hit a nerve!
Perhaps if you thought before leaping in to slag the team every chance you get you might not get singled out - and yes - I have been critical of the manager these last two games - this being the exception to my normal stance - but unfortunately - you are the polar opposite.
ps - put your bricks away and get behind the boys tonight eh?
pps - I lied, Took my bloody phone to Scotland after all - big mistake!
Hardly surprising that I am the majority poster when its my f))king name on the thread title! I'm very relaxed at the moment, beer in hand, chilled, no "nerve hitting" at all, just time on my hands and a bunch of sh1theads (Btw, that includes that prize sanctimonious f00kwit Hopelesslyoptimistic) to wind up, whats not to be chilled about ?
Refer to post #18. where I quote from the newsfeed another "fan" (or Leeds hater, if you prefer) who predicts a loss for Leeds, which of course gets no mention at all (it's not from me, so why would it?).
MOT, ALAW, blah blah blah