I have not gone into the figures in detail because I can't be bothered with trying to debunk attempted conspiracy theories. Some quick searching brings up:
https://www.who.int/data/stories/the...cess-mortality
https://www.economist.com/graphic-de...deaths-tracker
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulat...019to2020final
If you've got time you'll know doubt be able to dig deeper.
A few points:
Excess deaths will be skewed by actions taken by individual countries. Those that have taken draconian actions such as Australia will not only have a smaller impact due to covid but by limiting activity will have reduced deaths from many causes whether other transmissible diseases, road accidents, or being eaten by sharks.
Excess death and Covid reporting in countries which do not have an infrastructure will be sketchy at best but certainly look unhealthy.
The headline UK figures are predominantly concerned with the load on the NHS. Our whole policy has been dictated about the NHS's ability to cope.
A true excess deaths figure would have be available if:
1) No-one took any special action over Covid
2) Vaccines hadn't been rolled out
3) Lockdowns and restrictions hadn't been put in place
We then would have had scenes as we saw in Italy in the early stages with people dying in queues trying to get into hospitals which in any event were ill-equipped.
As it is now most first world countries have a good percentage of the population vaccinated, intensive care ventilators available, much knowledge on other effective treatments as well as would appear a level of herd immunity growing. That some individuals have been able to escape the worst ravages of this disease is lucky for them. For those of you who would be content to say "well he was over 60" you could have faced an empty Pavis and I say go fluck yourself and hope a red-back bites your bum.