Hart's off to Leeds?

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Reports suggest Hart is heading east down the M62 to join Dirty Weeds.

Thoughts?

[1959_60]

Best for all concerned I think.

i don't think he will ever be very popular here, which is a shame.

And I'm sure that he doesn't want to be established as Burnley's number two at this stage of his career.

Have you got a source BT?

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Best for all concerned I think.

i don't think he will ever be very popular here, which is a shame.

And I'm sure that he doesn't want to be established as Burnley's number two at this stage of his career.

Have you got a source BT?

Several 59er. The media are all over it.

https://www.teamtalk.com/news/joe-ha...leeds-transfer

[Claret_Matelot]

Trust me it is no great loss. He is a disruptive influence in the dressing room. The fact that Gobson is is mate speaks volumes..

[sinkov]

Trust me it is no great loss. He is a disruptive influence in the dressing room. The fact that Gobson is is mate speaks volumes..

I remember that picture you posted Matelot, when asked which of the squad was, shall we say, less than welcoming on the occasion of your visit. As they say, a picture paints a thousand words, and you had him sussed back then. He won't be missed, Tom is.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

I have tried to fathom out why we signed him in the first place and still can only conclude that Citeh bunged us to take him off their hands.

The way we conduct our transfer business would suggest this can be the only valid reason we signed him. He was bobbins for us anyway!

[sinkov]

I have tried to fathom out why we signed him in the first place and still can only conclude that Citeh bunged us to take him off their hands.

It was a mystery BT, it still is a mystery, when you look at the goalkeeping depth in the squad at the time, we simply didn't need him. Maybe it was a good deal financially for us, but we'll probably have to wait until Mike retires and writes his book to find out.