+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 71

Thread: O/T greedy coogan

  1. #41
    ....

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    18,189
    Quote Originally Posted by John2 View Post
    No, I don't think it has. If you think a tax payer using a tax payer funded scheme for its intended purpose is immoral because of their political views I think you don't understand how society works.

    There are many things I think need changing in society - maybe I think I should pay more tax - but if I campaign for higher taxes I'm not obligated to write in a higher number on my tax return or immoral if I don't. We all have to play by the same rules even if we think they're broken.
    He can choose not to claim, many haven’t.

    We are facing a massive fraud from furlough payments as it is

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    4,750
    Quote Originally Posted by gm_gm View Post
    He can choose not to claim, many haven’t.

    We are facing a massive fraud from furlough payments as it is
    Anyone can choose to do anything. As long as they operate within the rules that's their choice. There is no evidence he's committing fraud or abusing the system. His biggest crime appears to be being simultaneously wealthy and liberal which has got some jealous right wingers riled up.

    If the scheme is poorly implemented or policed that's not Coogan's fault and an utter waste of time to target such frustrations at him.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    3,726
    Quote Originally Posted by gm_gm View Post
    He can choose not to claim, many haven’t.

    We are facing a massive fraud from furlough payments as it is
    Yet your company did choose to claim gm. So no different to Coogan.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,994
    Claimed that if if it was a labour government he would not have furloughed them. Does he not realise that his actions will still have to be paid for by anyone who pays taxes.

    Idiot lefty labour supporter is a disgrace.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    18,189
    Quote Originally Posted by WanChaiMiller View Post
    Yet your company did choose to claim gm. So no different to Coogan.
    Sorry, wanChai I don’t have either a gardener or a cleaner

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    11,268
    This was preempted by Millers fans last time we were at Carrow Road
    HT Norwich 0-1 Rotherham and in full and rather inebriated voice....


    Alan Partridge what a *anker
    Alan Partridge is a banker

    Even the Norwich fans were nodding in agreement and he's one of their own

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    3,726
    Quote Originally Posted by gm_gm View Post
    Sorry, wanChai I don’t have either a gardener or a cleaner
    Are you saying your company did not furlough staff?

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    4,750
    Quote Originally Posted by gm_gm View Post
    Sorry, wanChai I don’t have either a gardener or a cleaner
    So if you had employed gardeners or cleaners you'd have chosen to make them unemployed rather than use the furlough scheme?

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    35,285
    Quote Originally Posted by John2 View Post
    So if you had employed gardeners or cleaners you'd have chosen to make them unemployed rather than use the furlough scheme?
    Is there any reason why a gardener can’t do his job?
    Cleaner I understand.

Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •