Channel 4 have released some information on the "successful" test and trace system.
https://www.channel4.com/news/reveal...channel-4-news
If I understand that correctly, about 40% of people testing positive have signed up for the test and trace system. And the tracing teams have contacted about 36% of the 'leads they've been given.
So 25,000 tracers have managed to contact 1,700 people in four days. One contact for every 14 tracers. By my reckoning that will be somewhere in the order of £8 million in wages or £4,700 per contact made. How many of those contacts had the virus or changed their behaviour as a result of the contact is anyone's guess.
And this is what Matt Hancock calls a success.
Last edited by Lasterman; 02-06-2020 at 09:18 PM.
I read that article a few days ago. It confirms the issue with trying to make death rate comparisons at this time. It won't stop people doing it though if it serves their political purposes.
Even still, at this point its looking like we'll have the highest death toll in Europe without any real doubt.
Why? Well, the president of epidemiology at the Royal Society of Medicine thinks it was because politicians didn't listen to advice and took us into lock down too late.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TGjKKexdzg
Is he making this point for political purposes? Are we allowed to listen to what he has to say, or is it "too soon"?
I think we talked about this on the CV (3) thread and the fact that Washington State where I live and the UK went into lock down on about the same day despite here having the first reported case (Jan) and death (Feb) in the US that were if I remember correctly about a week before the first ones in the UK.
Our population is 7.5M with a density of 103/sq mile. Deaths currently 1,118 or 149/million.
UK population 66M with a density of 701/sq mile. Deaths currently 39,904 or 604/million.
So UK has 7x the population density but only 4x the death rate? Have they managed it better or is population density irrelevant?
Lies, damn lies and medical statistics