Is that standard practice in loan arrangements MSM?
I can understand the “whether he plays or not” if he’s fit but we choose not to play him as that’s on us.
However, having to keep paying his salary following a serious injury meaning the lad has to return to his parent club seems a bit of a stupid deal to me.
Would make far more sense if deals like this were cancelled if such a scenario arose where the player has to return to his parent club - but I don’t know if this is the standard practice or not.
Either way, another bunch of money we don’t have pished away on a long term injured player - just brilliant.
Be as well re-signing Scott Booth...