+ Visit Carlisle United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Support this club initiative you *****

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    206

    Support this club initiative you *****

    https://www.carlisleunited.co.uk/news/2020/june/blues-store-club-branded-face-masks-available/

  2. #2


    John Nixon is buying two, that will be one for each face.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    3,677
    Ohhhh bitchy

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    155
    I would suggest that if people support this good cause, they don't buy anything from the club and instead just donate the full amount of money to Jigsaw directly. My personal opinion is that fans should not put any money into the club until Jenkins and the two parasites have left.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    20,094
    I agree up to a point, Kessler. if there’s no money coming in, who pays the shop staff? Why pays the groundsmen, the girls in the office etc? Not all of the money goes to the three leeches.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    623
    Pattison, Nixon and Jenkins draw no wages from the club. I believe that the beef about money is that any money coming into the club would be controlled by them and thus seriously wasted by them carrying out their policies.

    It could now be that they have no substantial power. EWM's John Jackson is on the Holdings board. He may well set the overall budget and play a part in how much greater the EWM 'facility' becomes. My guess is that at the Holdings board meetings JJ has all the power. He gets the message of what he wants done through to 1921's Chief Executive, Nigel Clibbens (albeit NC is not on the Holdings board).

    Pattison, Nixon and Jenkins are still officially in place but have no power. Nigel Clibbens (Chief Executive of 1921) carries out the running of 1921 under the control of EWM's John Jackson making the crucial decisions at Holdings board meetings. The result of the Holdings board voting against a John Jackson policy would be cataclysmic for the other Holdings directors and quite possibly for the club. He is in total control and no other Holdings directors are of any consequence.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    155
    If EWM are in charge then they need to make that official. At the moment it seems like they want to have their cake and eat it, call all the shots without any of the responsibilities that come with officially owning the club.

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •