+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 34 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 339

Thread: O/T 48,000 illegal immigrants housed in mainly 4 star UK hotels

  1. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by wendun View Post
    A friend of mine in the loop mentioned to me the case of a large group of around 200 landed at Dover last year. 183 of the group were young men. The Today programme on Radio 4 covered it (they don't even bother these days). The only person they interviewed was a woman, one of only 15 on the boat, who had a young child with her and was also pregnant and the BBC slanted the story as a horror tale of desperate plight. They are all taking the p*ss.
    They should have sent that reporter Dermot McWhinger (can't remember his real name) He usually digs up a kid in a wheelchair that's wanting to live in the UK and become a heart surgeon. Not one that wants to collect benefits, pay no tax, be housed for nothing and wash cars in Parkgate

    We never learn

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,538
    FU**ING marvelous, all the fish thats caught in UK waters europe want a share, all the illegal immigrants thats caught in UK waters europe dont want to share.!!!! W**KERS

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    5,967
    Quote Originally Posted by Grist_To_The_Mill View Post
    They should have sent that reporter Dermot McWhinger (can't remember his real name) He usually digs up a kid in a wheelchair that's wanting to live in the UK and become a heart surgeon. Not one that wants to collect benefits, pay no tax, be housed for nothing and wash cars in Parkgate

    We never learn
    The BBC has me on a register of loonies as I frequently berate them. One report on Radio 4 referred to the violent mob pulling down statues as "anti-slavery protesters". I pointed out that this was wrong on two counts. Firstly, it presupposed there was still slavery in Britain for this mob to be anti. Secondly, the use of anti also presupposed there was a group in Britain somewhere who were "pro-slavery". As everyone I know opposes slavery but do not express that opposition by pulling down statues or firebombing the police I told Auntie it was fatuous to attempt to justify such behaviour on such grounds.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    5,662
    Quote Originally Posted by wendun View Post
    The BBC has me on a register of loonies as I frequently berate them. One report on Radio 4 referred to the violent mob pulling down statues as "anti-slavery protesters". I pointed out that this was wrong on two counts. Firstly, it presupposed there was still slavery in Britain for this mob to be anti. Secondly, the use of anti also presupposed there was a group in Britain somewhere who were "pro-slavery". As everyone I know opposes slavery but do not express that opposition by pulling down statues or firebombing the police I told Auntie it was fatuous to attempt to justify such behaviour on such grounds.
    Well, at least the BBC has got something right!

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    12,501
    I think it's the UN.

    They are clearly doing as much as they can to move as many people as possible from the third world to the first.

    They don't want a first world and a third, they want everywhere to be second world and therefore "equal" and of course a world government run by them.

    They are being aided by governments, banks, corporations and billionaire globalists to achieve this.

    Conservatives, Labour, Lib Dems and SNP are all on board.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    5,662
    Quote Originally Posted by great_fire View Post
    I think it's the UN.

    They are clearly doing as much as they can to move as many people as possible from the third world to the first.

    They don't want a first world and a third, they want everywhere to be second world and therefore "equal" and of course a world government run by them.

    They are being aided by governments, banks, corporations and billionaire globalists to achieve this.

    Conservatives, Labour, Lib Dems and SNP are all on board.
    What about the Greens?

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    12,501
    Quote Originally Posted by Pattylallacks2 View Post
    What about the Greens?
    They are in favour of open borders, therefore not green, as people moving from the undeveloped world to the developed increases pollution and emissions, so actually another socialist party, and on board of course.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    3,726
    Quote Originally Posted by great_fire View Post
    They are in favour of open borders, therefore not green, as people moving from the undeveloped world to the developed increases pollution and emissions, so actually another socialist party, and on board of course.
    There is a fair whack of people moving in all directions from what I see.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    12,501
    Quote Originally Posted by WanChaiMiller View Post
    There is a fair whack of people moving in all directions from what I see.
    People aren't moving from the first world to the third world though are they? And leaving behind their cars and central heating.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    3,726
    Quote Originally Posted by great_fire View Post
    People aren't moving from the first world to the third world though are they? And leaving behind their cars and central heating.
    I think they are. Certainly many getting jobs in developing countries.

Page 2 of 34 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •