Transfer in's and out's rumours etc.

[Tichi1]

Ryan Kent is a name that keeps popping up.

20 million quid release clause..Rangers may need to sell to balance the books..rumours we could get him for 15 million!

Worth a punt..or not?

Not at 15-20 million IMO


PS - Longest thread for ages ??

[Rev72]

Not at 15-20 million IMO


PS - Longest thread for ages ??

12 millions about right IMO for an unproven at this level player.

And yes this is a long thread..quite a bit of sh1te in it as well..was gonna blame Belfast-Andy for it but he's hardly said owt

[Rev72]

Heard the Dan James deal was dead then a rumour doing the rounds saying we could be in for him again on loan till the end of the season

[Billyni]

12 millions about right IMO for an unproven at this level player.

And yes this is a long thread..quite a bit of sh1te in it as well..was gonna blame Belfast-Andy for it but he's hardly said owt

Blame him anyway. I’m sure someone else is getting his earache

[hopelesslyoptimistic]

Kent is the one MB wants so should pay what is needed.

[WTF11]

Kent is the one MB wants so should pay what is needed.

How does anyone know what "MB wants"? Is there anything in the public domain that supports your statement? He (M watched Kent in a pre-season friendly and Klopp made some pleasant noises at the end of pre-season before selling him to Rangers, very consistent, not!

Entire career he has played 166 games and scored 23 times, most of those (85/19) in a league where are are only 3-4 teams to compete with. Compare with Harrison, 155/25, 50% if which (81/11), in the Championship and/or PL. THATS the kind of quality we need, not some second rate reject from Liverpool who couldn't cut it at our level.

[hopelesslyoptimistic]

Phil Hay, Adam Pope, Graeme Smyrh have all said he is the one MB really wants - he also tried to get him on loan without success previously.

Those journalists all speak to Leeds officials and have access to Bielsa so would expect them to know and they are not prone to
click baitery.

Don’t get your vitriol either. You were wrong about Harrison and Costa, you were wrong about Liverpool, you were wrong about our start to the season.

I prefer to rely on MBs opinion and he is said to rate him very highly - will rely on that opinion thanks.

[WTF11]

Phil Hay, Adam Pope, Graeme Smyrh have all said he is the one MB really wants - he also tried to get him on loan without success previously.

Those journalists all speak to Leeds officials and have access to Bielsa so would expect them to know and they are not prone to
click baitery.

Don’t get your vitriol either. You were wrong about Harrison and Costa, you were wrong about Liverpool, you were wrong about our start to the season.

I prefer to rely on MBs opinion and he is said to rate him very highly - will rely on that opinion thanks.

Not vitriol, just looking at what he hasn't done as opposed to what we need.

I'd suggest you be careful as to what I got wrong or right (and in each of the examples you give, at least I've been honest enough to admit the error, unlike many others when mention of other "good pieces of business" are mentioned!), if you want to trade numbers then I'll put up a post that would break Footymad

And since when do you take anything pundits say with anything other than a huge pinch of salt? And in answer to my question as to what us in the public domain, answer came there none (please point me in the direction of a direct quite from M.

[hopelesslyoptimistic]

There are lots of pundits I disregard - those that tend to speak in banalities. The three journos I mentioned are well connected, speak sense and have a deep knowledge of Leeds.

Please can you just desist from turning everything into a battle with your view and that you know best. With everything else going on it is depressing enough without dealing with your modus operandi too.

[hopelesslyoptimistic]

If I was short with you the WTF I apologise just dealing with the fact my trip to see my mum who is old and frail in Leeds is now not possible.