+ Visit Aberdeen FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: 5 subs allowed

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,421

    5 subs allowed

    Why the phuck have we agreed to this? Talk about turkeys voting for Christmas! This will benefit 2 teams only who could play 2 different teams of 11 every week and still pump the majority of sh!te in our league. Now giving them the option of 5 fresh sets of legs surely makes it even tougher for everyone else?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    12,430
    At least 75% of the league voted for it. They are saying it's for player safety just now but I'm not sure it makes a difference.

    It doesn't benefit anyone more than the two teams with the biggest budgets.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    21,494
    Safety my a’rse

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    20,674
    Are we having those "drinks breaks" as well?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,943
    You’ll get one at half time

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,254
    I didn't pay attention in england.

    So 9 subs, make 5 but only disrupt game 3 times.

    If you use half time does that count as a disruption? What if you throw a sub on when the other team have started doing one?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    14,682
    I don’t mind the 5 subs thing for a month maybe?
    And only in 3 batches like we can do now.
    They’ve not played for 5 months so it lessens chance of muscle injuries.
    Then on Sept 1st revert to 3.

    Thankfully we haven’t agreed to the farcical drinks breaks.
    Can you imagine.... 9 degrees at Pittodrie in October & stopping for a drink?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,844
    In short, it should benefit team with bigger / better squads, but the optimist in me hopes it will give the opportunity for more youngsters to get more game time.
    They should have introduced a caveat that the extra 2 subs that could be used should be u-21’s

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,850
    Quote Originally Posted by RedStarTorphins View Post
    I don’t mind the 5 subs thing for a month maybe?
    And only in 3 batches like we can do now.
    They’ve not played for 5 months so it lessens chance of muscle injuries.
    Then on Sept 1st revert to 3.

    Thankfully we haven’t agreed to the farcical drinks breaks.
    Can you imagine.... 9 degrees at Pittodrie in October & stopping for a drink?
    Get the flask on the pitch with some nice hot tea or coffee... ideal!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,705
    Quote Originally Posted by ByeByeScum2012 View Post
    Why the phuck have we agreed to this? Talk about turkeys voting for Christmas! This will benefit 2 teams only who could play 2 different teams of 11 every week and still pump the majority of sh!te in our league. Now giving them the option of 5 fresh sets of legs surely makes it even tougher for everyone else?
    Im only guessing its because the players have not played a competitive game in 5 months so if the Sports Scientists do their stuff maybe if they can see a player "going into the red" then the can suggest getting them subbed off before getting an injury as we have enough of them already , so from that point of view I don't mind it for now maybe for 1st couple months of season

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •