+ Visit Derby County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 152 of 299 FirstFirst ... 52102142150151152153154162202252 ... LastLast
Results 1,511 to 1,520 of 2981

Thread: O/T. The Government's handling of Covid

  1. #1511
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    7,203
    Quote Originally Posted by MadAmster View Post
    Agree with your whole post Swale but have quoted just the one paragraph and highlighted one clause.

    That is precisely the reason I am still a "not yet". There are still no figures that I have been able to find thus far on how people with my physiology, my underlying conditions and my medicine use available. I'm not shy of the odd gamble but when it's my life I'm gambling with, I want more data to work with than there is currently available.

    Kudos to those who have already bitten the bullet.

    As you say, no medicine is risk free, paracetamol, aspirin and ibuprofen can have bad effects on some people yet they are taken by millions across the world. The difference between paracetamol and AZ/BionTech/Janssen/Moderna is that the former has been in use for decades and there is history. These vaccines are new and the data I want just isn't there. I'd hate my epitaph to be Covid didn't get him but AZ etc did........
    To each their own but I'd hate my epitaph to be 'Covid got him but at least he didn't taka a vaccine'.

    Listening to the pointy heads on tv this am (including rA's and my own favourite Fergus Walsh), and I'm surprised this wasn't investigated and made public earlier, the incidence of blood clots in the AZ vaccinated population is no different to that in the Pfizer vaccinated population. The EU panic is, to quote use a great word used last eve, 'baffling'.

  2. #1512
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    6,555
    As someone who is prescribed aspirin as a blood thinner, thus affording some clotting protection, I note they have nasty impact on stomach lining causing me to need a counteractive medication to reduce stomach acid production. This in turn leads to.....

    My point is, every medication has an element of downside which can be dealt with by a further drug. This seems to be big pharma's business model to sustain growth. Rather like the theory that they have a cure for cancer but would lose so much money/sales if they released it, they won't do so.

    But whilst there are potential consequences to any medication, they are generally no worse than the consequences of no medication

  3. #1513
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    7,495
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy_Faber View Post
    To each their own but I'd hate my epitaph to be 'Covid got him but at least he didn't taka a vaccine'.
    Understand what you're saying Andy, however, I've managed to avoid the virus for a year now by being careful. I don't intend to do anything different in the coming months. They say past behaviour are the best predictor of future behaviour. I'm backing my own history at the moment.

    Just to put your mind at rest, I've not said I'm not having it, just not yet.

  4. #1514
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    13,016
    Quote Originally Posted by swaledale View Post
    There is no known thrombosis risk, and its not the government but medical regulators who are saying this, so rA we can't pin anything on the government, even if some side effect or other does arise from either the Az or Pfizer vaccines.
    I’m not actually trying to ‘pin anything on the Government’, Swale. God knows we don’t want or need Covid to do that and I would love them to be successful.

    I’m just uncomfortable with the idea of having to believe the likes of Johnson and Raab over something as important as vaccines when they’ve been shown to be incompetent at best, and downright liars at worst, over so many other issues.

    Personally I loathe the ‘we’re alright Jack attitude’ that keeps resurfacing on here and throughout the country.
    Having said that, there have, paradoxically, been some wise if contradictory words written on here, from MA’s very personal but totally reasonable reservations, to GP’s closing comment, that the ‘...potential consequences of any medication are generally no worse than the consequences of no medication’, both of which I can sympathise with.
    Last edited by ramAnag; 16-03-2021 at 09:34 AM.

  5. #1515
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    20,673
    Baffling doesn't even cover it.
    The EU is determined to tear itself apart over stuff like this.
    Listen to virologist Simon Clarke on talkradio.

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...-eu-parliament

  6. #1516
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    20,105
    Quote Originally Posted by MadAmster View Post
    Agree with your whole post Swale but have quoted just the one paragraph and highlighted one clause.

    That is precisely the reason I am still a "not yet". There are still no figures that I have been able to find thus far on how people with my physiology, my underlying conditions and my medicine use available. I'm not shy of the odd gamble but when it's my life I'm gambling with, I want more data to work with than there is currently available.

    Kudos to those who have already bitten the bullet.

    As you say, no medicine is risk free, paracetamol, aspirin and ibuprofen can have bad effects on some people yet they are taken by millions across the world. The difference between paracetamol and AZ/BionTech/Janssen/Moderna is that the former has been in use for decades and there is history. These vaccines are new and the data I want just isn't there. I'd hate my epitaph to be Covid didn't get him but AZ etc did........
    I don't disagree with your approach, however whilst the vaccines are new, they are based on pre existing vaccines that have been used widely before, so the chances of ill effects are very small. I doubt that the data covering all effects of the current vaccines will be available for years, though obviously its incremental process, personally I've had the Pfizer jab, not that there was a choice.

    You assessment of keeping Covid free is fine, but to me unless you isolate yourself from every external contact, there is no way of knowing whether you will come into contact with a person infected who has no symptoms and I don't see the point of living life like a hermit for the next couple of years.
    Last edited by swaledale; 16-03-2021 at 10:15 AM.

  7. #1517
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3,035
    A German MEP acknowledged on BBC News earlier that, following the row with AZ over supplies of their vaccine, there is an element of politicising over the suspension of its' usage! In addition she said that it's likely that the AZ Vaccine will be ultimately phased out in favour of Pfizer! When asked 'why' when statistics showed little difference between the two she waffled!
    It seems that Macron and co are seeking revenge! To me, it's up to them if killing some of their population justifies tit for tat tactics!

  8. #1518
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    7,495
    Follow the money. AZ sells at cost. Pfizer costs 6 times that. Can't have the poor old shareholders missing out on all that lovely dividend can we?

    As for the number of thrombosis cases..... AZ has less than Pfizer. In the AZ tests, those with the vaccine had fewer instances of thrombosis than those who had the placebo. Both AZ and Pfizer show a lower instance of cases than occurs naturally among the non-vaccinated...... IMO if it isn't the money then it's political.

  9. #1519
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    20,105
    Quote Originally Posted by MadAmster View Post
    Follow the money. AZ sells at cost. Pfizer costs 6 times that. Can't have the poor old shareholders missing out on all that lovely dividend can we?

    As for the number of thrombosis cases..... AZ has less than Pfizer. In the AZ tests, those with the vaccine had fewer instances of thrombosis than those who had the placebo. Both AZ and Pfizer show a lower instance of cases than occurs naturally among the non-vaccinated...... IMO if it isn't the money then it's political.
    Politicians trying to make capital out of a pandemic because another country has done better with vaccinations? Never thought I'd see the day!

  10. #1520
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    20,673
    Today Nicola Magrini, who runs Italian medicines regulator AIFA, said politicians in were pressured to ban the Covid jabs after Germany and France did.

    Mr Magrini told La Repubblica: "We got to the point of a suspension because several European countries, including Germany and France, preferred to interrupt vaccinations... to put them on hold in order to carry out checks.

    'BREXIT SULK'
    "The choice is a political one."

    French Europe Minister Clement Beaune admitted the suspension heaped "political pressure" on AstraZeneca amid the ongoing supply dispute.

    He told Radio Classique: "There are concerns. And more than that, probably a number of breaches of contract.

    “Europe is not going to be some sort of cuddly 'care bear' that hands over its money and expects nothing in return.

    “We will defend our interests. There may be legal recourse. We are not ruling it out.”

    Mr Beaune also said the EU “must put pressure” on AstraZeneca to force it to deliver more doses to the bloc even as millions lie unused in fridges.

    He said: “We are stronger among Europeans than if France did it alone.

    "Before any legal recourse, there is political pressure, or even the board of directors, internally in the company.”

Page 152 of 299 FirstFirst ... 52102142150151152153154162202252 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •