O/T Coronavirus Thread (5)

[the_idiotb_stardson]

I thought you was giving up on beating the statistics drum? Listen to what she says between 10:40 and 10:55. It's complete nonsense.

Maybe....but the false positives?

[CAMiller]

Maybe....but the false positives?

Well of course there will be false positives as there nearly always are in medical tests. However she seems to be mixing up false positives with tests that are negative. e.g. 90% of people taking the community tests are negative, i.e. they think they have the virus, get tested, and don't have it. At least that's what I could make out from her ramblings, I might be wrong as I gave up after listening 3 times and trying to decipher.

[the_idiotb_stardson]

, I might be wrong as I gave up after listening 3 times and trying to decipher.

How convenient.

[CAMiller]

How convenient.

OK then Einstein, you listen to that 15s section I referenced and explain to me what she is saying?

[wendun]

According to the latest reports the public is "tiring" of Covid restrictions and coming round to the view that many thousands will die each year just like flu but at least they'll be able to go to Ibiza and the pub.

[the_idiotb_stardson]

OK then Einstein, you listen to that 15s section I referenced and explain to me what she is saying?

Professor Carl Heneghan, clarifies the issue. He was the man who exposed the errors in the figures the other month when people who had recovered from covid then died of other causes were being included in the stats.

https://youtu.be/iUAmhFJBmts

[John2]

Professor Carl Heneghan, clarifies the issue. He was the man who exposed the errors in the figures the other month when people who had recovered from covid then died of other causes were being included in the stats.

https://youtu.be/iUAmhFJBmts

I've just had to have a sit down, you've actually shared a credible scientist making a reasonable point.

It doesn't really back up what the talk radio journalist appears to be saying though.

[the_idiotb_stardson]

I've just had to have a sit down, you've actually shared a credible scientist making a reasonable point.

It doesn't really back up what the talk radio journalist appears to be saying though.

I have shared numerous credible scientist and a few duffers.

You have famously missed the point I was making from the outset.

Following "The Science" as governments the world over, are claiming to do is complete nonsenses as "science" is not a unified body of thought. There are credible scientists on all sides of the debate, plus cranks and crackpots.


My point from the outset is that the scientists who are driving our campaign have links to huge pharmaceutical companies. One of these companies currently involved in yet another investigation for fraud. The same company has paid out millions in fines over the years for bad practice.


"The Science " from the beginning has been challenged by experts from the outset. These people have been silenced, marginalised and had their careers threatened.


Parliament has not debated anything. Boris is ruling by decree. The shameful lack of opposition from Labour has been a disgrace, especially when 6 million will soon be unemployed.


I proposed right from the beginning, a short sharp lockdown, while parliament debated this and heard expert opinion from all sides.


I note a letter signed by more experts was sent to the government this week about Corona.


One of which Prof Gupta I referenced months ago on this site.


https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3702

https://www.sciencemediacentre.org/e...ta-and-others/

[John2]

I have shared numerous credible scientist and a few duffers.

You have famously missed the point I was making from the outset.

Following "The Science" as governments the world over, are claiming to do is complete nonsenses as "science" is not a unified body of thought. There are credible scientists on all sides of the debate, plus cranks and crackpots.


My point from the outset is that the scientists who are driving our campaign have links to huge pharmaceutical companies. One of these companies currently involved in yet another investigation for fraud. The same company has paid out millions in fines over the years for bad practice.

How very apt. Here you've gone and veered from credible and serious point in one paragraph, to joining the cranks and crackpots in the next desperate for there to be some sort of conspiracy that doesn't exist.

[the_idiotb_stardson]

How very apt. Here you've gone and veered from credible and serious point in one paragraph, to joining the cranks and crackpots in the next desperate for there to be some sort of conspiracy that doesn't exist.

Any comment on this breaking story John?

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...rm-contracted/


Any one else care to comment?

Any one want to loan my tin foil hat?