+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 33

Thread: Will we spoil Ladapo,

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    4,924
    Can I just point out that we wasn’t playing 4411 against Norwich or Forest we played 433 with wiles and miller at side of him

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    35,285
    Quote Originally Posted by Silly-miller View Post
    Can I just point out that we wasn’t playing 4411 against Norwich or Forest we played 433 with wiles and miller at side of him
    He did but it didn’t seem like that against Forest

  3. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Silly-miller View Post
    Can I just point out that we wasn’t playing 4411 against Norwich or Forest we played 433 with wiles and miller at side of him
    To me it looks like a:

    4 2 3 1

    Its obviously meant to be fluid, I.e. a 5 on midfield when out of possession but 3 in attack when on the front foot.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    4,924
    Name:  ACA6AF9D-5355-4862-84A1-E02308D3A670.jpg
Views: 183
Size:  22.7 KB Norwich

    Name:  BC04AB7E-2136-47C5-8115-BD53D09AB8A3.jpg
Views: 180
Size:  17.3 KB forest

    You could say it’s 4321 or 433

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    47,234
    Silly, on paper yes but that isn't how I saw it being played on the pitch.

  6. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Brin View Post
    Silly, on paper yes but that isn't how I saw it being played on the pitch.
    Yes and that's the issue

    Miller and Wiles fall back and Crooks and Barlaser get pushed into more central midfield

    So becomes 4-5-1

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    47,234
    Quote Originally Posted by Grist_To_The_Mill View Post
    Yes and that's the issue

    Miller and Wiles fall back and Crooks and Barlaser get pushed into more central midfield

    So becomes 4-5-1
    Grist that's just how I see it, shame the Management team don't.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    24,736
    Quote Originally Posted by Silly-miller View Post
    Name:  ACA6AF9D-5355-4862-84A1-E02308D3A670.jpg
Views: 183
Size:  22.7 KB Norwich

    Name:  BC04AB7E-2136-47C5-8115-BD53D09AB8A3.jpg
Views: 180
Size:  17.3 KB forest

    You could say it’s 4321 or 433
    Wunt take much notice of what it says on ifollow. Warne abandoned 4 3 3 last season thank god! We played either 4411 on Tues or 4 5 1. You could tell the way Miller and Wiles tracked back from the start that they weren't particularly playing in an advanced role.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    3,726
    Selection is a trade off between defending and attack. I suspect Warnes first priority this season is that we do not become whipping boys of the League. Make sure we dont conceed and nick a couple at the other end.

    To him credit hes done it really well to date - we've been in all games to the final whistle.

    If we go to 2 up front we may conceed more. If we play one up front you pick your most prolific striker.*

    If we go 442 and drop one of the front 2 back when we defend then do we either play a midfielder in that role (better defensively) or a striker?

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    3,726
    Quote Originally Posted by Silly-miller View Post
    Name:  ACA6AF9D-5355-4862-84A1-E02308D3A670.jpg
Views: 183
Size:  22.7 KB Norwich

    Name:  BC04AB7E-2136-47C5-8115-BD53D09AB8A3.jpg
Views: 180
Size:  17.3 KB forest

    You could say it’s 4321 or 433
    Or 451 wnen we defend. Warne wants 9 back so we are tigher at the back. Given those instructions Miller and Wiles will drop off when we defend.

    The problem we face is in transition. When we defend in a 451 formation and win the ball back, we cant get support up the pitch quick enough for a quick counter.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •