+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 3 of 19 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 182

Thread: MillersMad Matchthread - The Millers v Sheffield Wednesday

  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by rolymiller View Post
    Rotherham United
    @OfficialRUFC
    · 1m
    TEAM v @swfc | Blackman; Harding, Ihiekwe, Wood, Mattock; Jozefzoon, Wiles, Lindsay, Barlaser, Miller; Ladapo

    Subs | Johansson, Jones, S. MacDonald, Crooks, Sadlier, Hirst, Smith

    So 2 wingers and a spare man in midfield. I would put that man on the poisoned dwarf because he makes em tick. My instinct is to put Lindsay on him but wilesy might do the same job.

    A decent line up if everyone performs as they can
    Well as Warney listened to us, as at first glance we seem to have players in there natural position, not sure it’s our strongest line up but time will tell as I’d like to have see Crookes and S.MAcDonald in middle of Park with Barlaser.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    35,285
    Wiles back in middle, good to see Warney took my advice ��
    He’ll probably have a crap game now ��

  3. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by rolymiller View Post
    Rotherham United
    @OfficialRUFC
    · 1m
    TEAM v @swfc | Blackman; Harding, Ihiekwe, Wood, Mattock; Jozefzoon, Wiles, Lindsay, Barlaser, Miller; Ladapo

    Subs | Johansson, Jones, S. MacDonald, Crooks, Sadlier, Hirst, Smith

    So 2 wingers and a spare man in midfield. I would put that man on the poisoned dwarf because he makes em tick. Don't let him have a kick. My instinct is to put Lindsay on him but wilesy might do the same job.

    A decent line up if everyone performs as they can
    Yes indeed, but not that attacking is it?

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    18,189
    That line up can be quite attacking if the wingers oerform

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    4,924
    Name:  924DFE74-C931-4D2A-A401-47C19C0A0F69.jpg
Views: 453
Size:  11.2 KB

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    467
    Quote Originally Posted by Grist_To_The_Mill View Post
    Well maybe you’re right on that, but it depends in the nature of the defeat ( if it happens) if it’s a defeat after playing 4-5-1 then the criticism might be more severe
    4-5-1 it is

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    5,238
    Quote Originally Posted by Grist_To_The_Mill View Post
    Only playing one player won't help

    I see some of our fans have already started "looking over their shoulders" at other team's results.

    Not good

    Severe pressure on PW if we lose tonight
    I think we might play eleven players tonight

  8. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by gm_gm View Post
    That line up can be quite attacking if the wingers oerform
    Maybe but more 4-5-1 than 4-3-3

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    2,721
    It is 4-5-1, but at least by having 2 proper wingers on either side means it should be a more attacking form of 4-5-1 than the last few games.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    24,736
    Take your points about 4 5 1 gents. If it is going tits up we can chuck another forrud on and remove one of cms. At least then, in theory, the 2 forruds will still be getting a supply from the wings.

    I'm gonna miss THAT cheating bas tard diving all over today...not!

    Has he got a club yet?
    Last edited by rolymiller; 28-10-2020 at 07:11 PM.

Page 3 of 19 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •