Originally Posted by
slack_pie
Of course, clubs with a rich history will always suggest that history matters, while clubs that have never achieved anything will have a go at those clubs for living in the past. In a way, both sides are right, but I'd rather be a fan of a club that has decent memories to fall back on.
I don't blame you for being more interested in Notts' past than present. The present is the worst we've ever been in our long history. It's shameful that we were so poorly run for so long that we ended up where we are today.
As for Mansfield, yes, it's a solid appointment. They'll probably kick on from here and do at least OK. In fact, I'd say they have just as good a chance of getting promoted from L2 as we do from the NL, especially if Ardley sticks around. I will happily concede that they are the better team and are currently more successful - there is literally zero basis to suggest otherwise. But I won't concede that they are a bigger or more significant club than Notts.
Just to hammer home my point one last time, imagine in a couple of years we end up in the same division as them again. With both clubs playing at the same level, would you consider Notts to be the bigger club or Mansfield? I'm guessing the answer is Notts. And the reason it's Notts is because the 3 or 4 years that they were above us wasn't enough to undo the countless years we were above them previously.