+ Visit Dundee FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 3 of 16 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 180

Thread: Today's lies from Sturgeon

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    17,501
    Quote Originally Posted by Taintedice View Post
    "Deaths of people tested positive within last 28 days and dying of any cause = 3,000"

    Everyone is sick to death of lockdown but what you are quoting are the numbers with lockdown. Without lockdown, even following the 'favoured' Swedish model, they'd be at least double, if not more. And every death is significant to someone, not forgetting the long-term impact on hundreds if not thousands of sufferers. The Chinese are vaccinating their population right now, the end could be in sight with the Pzifer vaccine.
    Sweden should now have 64000 deaths under the Sage model, they don't.

    Lockdowns don't work. The kill people, they make poor people poorer, they make comfortable people uncomfortable and they give future generations a financial headache but they may help octanganarians survive (not live) another 6 months.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    13,166
    Quote Originally Posted by Returnofrros View Post
    Sweden should now have 64000 deaths under the Sage model, they don't.

    Lockdowns don't work. The kill people, they make poor people poorer, they make comfortable people uncomfortable and they give future generations a financial headache but they may help octanganarians survive (not live) another 6 months.
    Why would SAGE model for Sweden who had 6000 deaths compared to Norway's 280? Why don't you ever mention Norway or NZ, who had 25 deaths. Very few lockdowns in the US, 1000 deaths a day, is it. That's not old people, that's young and old.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    17,501
    Quote Originally Posted by Deeranged View Post
    You can't prove that so it's only your opinion.

    With common sense and protection of only the vulnerable whilst letting the healthy population go about their normal business we'd likely see not many more. My opinion, same as yours is only an opinion.
    Like err what's that country called err tip of my tongue......mamma Mia what is it, we have to take a chance as the winner takes it all and this lockdown could be our Waterloo with the two dancing queens witty and Vallance, just gimme gimme gimme some hope.....Sweden that's it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    13,166
    Quote Originally Posted by Returnofrros View Post
    Like err what's that country called err tip of my tongue......mamma Mia what is it, we have to take a chance as the winner takes it all and this lockdown could be our Waterloo with the two dancing queens witty and Vallance, just gimme gimme gimme some hope.....Sweden that's it.
    Sweden is not the UK. The Swedish govt care about their people, we've done this before, getting boring now.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    4,718
    Hmac. Vote labour in the expectation that they are more likely to put a dent in SNP drive for independence. The only reason for all the rush is the life expectancy of a political leader. We need to see how Brexit works out. Everything is doom and gloom. The same was true when we had to leave the ERM. If Brexit doesn't work out it would be ironic if England decided to rejoin and Scotland was struggling to comply with currency and budget deficits.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,805
    Quote Originally Posted by BCram View Post
    Hmac. Vote labour in the expectation that they are more likely to put a dent in SNP drive for independence. The only reason for all the rush is the life expectancy of a political leader. We need to see how Brexit works out. Everything is doom and gloom. The same was true when we had to leave the ERM. If Brexit doesn't work out it would be ironic if England decided to rejoin and Scotland was struggling to comply with currency and budget deficits.
    Richard Leonard is a hard no from me.

    The loony left of the main Labour Party is a hard no from me.

    The ghost of Corbyn is hanging around, making Labour unelectable.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    4,718
    Quote Originally Posted by hmac View Post
    Richard Leonard is a hard no from me.

    The loony left of the main Labour Party is a hard no from me.

    The ghost of Corbyn is hanging around, making Labour unelectable.
    I am not so sure. I know Marxism is part of the left but as was seen when Corbyn was in charge they just do not trust the people despite all their protestations to the contrary. There is a strong Christian Democratic ethos in Britain but it does not have a single party to represent it. One Nation Tories, Lib-Dems and the Labour party when it is not in thrall to Militants or Trade Unions might possibly follow a Labour leader like Sir Keir Starmer. I think unionist minded voters might vote for Labour at the next election probably because unemployment might be a major issue and this could be a problem for the present Conservative government because they chose to make decisions rather than include other parties and parliament.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    6,492
    Quote Originally Posted by BCram View Post
    I am not so sure. I know Marxism is part of the left but as was seen when Corbyn was in charge they just do not trust the people despite all their protestations to the contrary. There is a strong Christian Democratic ethos in Britain but it does not have a single party to represent it. One Nation Tories, Lib-Dems and the Labour party when it is not in thrall to Militants or Trade Unions might possibly follow a Labour leader like Sir Keir Starmer. I think unionist minded voters might vote for Labour at the next election probably because unemployment might be a major issue and this could be a problem for the present Conservative government because they chose to make decisions rather than include other parties and parliament.
    Labour members picked the wrong brother when they selected Ed Miliband instead of his brother David Miliband.
    Labour would have won the 2015 General Election if David Miliband had been leader of the Labour Party instead of ‘Red’ Ed Miliband.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    3,757
    Up here Labour are the only alternative choice to the SNP. Until more of the electorate realise this and vote accordingly we will be stuck with the SNP.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,805
    Quote Originally Posted by Dee_Dee View Post
    Up here Labour are the only alternative choice to the SNP. Until more of the electorate realise this and vote accordingly we will be stuck with the SNP.
    God forbid we get stuck with Labour instead!

Page 3 of 16 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •