Hardly a shock, he's been treated like **** at Burnley, why on earth would he want to stay ?
Not surprisingly he Wants more game time
Sean says contract extension was to protect clubs interests!
https://www.lancs.live/sport/footbal...arets-19357955
Hardly a shock, he's been treated like **** at Burnley, why on earth would he want to stay ?
The media reported earlier in the week Vydra was happy to stay for "family reasons".
We simply must stop trusting what we read in the media.
Sean says contract extension was to protect clubs interests!
I was asking when it was aired if it was BFC forcing the extension or Vydra wanting it, looks like it was forced with Vydra saying he wants to leave, and who can blame him, he's been treated like a twohat since he stepped into Turf Moor, its appalling
12 minutes is hardly going to make him want to stay.
Why would he want to stay here where he is not given much of a chance to play his natural game.
I fail to understand why he is behind Wood and Barnes in the pecking order when the goal return of those two is so poor this season.
True - but how Sean thought he’d fit his style of play is the real question for me , in turn that then makes me think Sean didn’t ask for him and was simply given him and told top scorer in championship get on with it hence digs his heels in a nd he gets ten minutes at best to justify the powers that be buying him.
He and the club seem to have form so you may well be right, but very sad if true. People putting the future of the club and the players themselves at risk for their own pride is not a good scenario, the chairman and manager need to sort it out.
Most Loan players including Bamford, Nahki Wells, Gibson, have cost a pretty penny in fees and wages for no return.
It's a recurring theme OC, you can add Hart, Vydra and Chalobah to the money down the drain list as well, not to mention letting Hendrick walk for nowt. For a club that's supposed to be careful with the money, well we just aren't, are we ? Impossible to know exactly where the responsibility lies though, Manager, Chairman, CEO, Recruitment Team, or all four probably to varying degrees ? The buck stops with the Chairman imo, he's the boss, nothing can happen without his say so, so Garlick should carry the can.
Yes The chairman and CEO who implements Board policy are responsible for buying people the manager hasn’t wanted and for doing nothing to get recruitment to work with Sean. The manager for sidelining players who could have helped. I wonder if Defour was another but he won Sean over.