+ Visit Burnley FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 38

Thread: Reinforcements needed at Turf Moor

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    18,628

    Reinforcements needed at Turf Moor

    No goals, equals a relegation dog fight. Burnley need to add some firepower or the Championship beckons. - External Link

  2. #2
    After suffering a week of two one-nil defeats, to be closely followed by a run of Premier League fixtures from which few if any, points can be anticipated, Burnley are now facing the prospect, nay likelihood, that when the veritable six pointer home game against Brighton comes around on the 6th February, the Clarets will find themselves back in the bottom three EPL relegation spots.

    The relentless slog of two matches per week offers no time to recuperate, no time to step back, to analyse or to address deficiencies on the training ground.

    Those deficiencies have been present all season: a lack of imagination and impetus going forward; a tactical approach from Sean Dyche that is too inflexible, and a paucity of the resources needed to affect change to the course of a game. If Burnley don’t create goal-scoring opportunities from set-pieces, they don’t seem able to create them at all.

    In attack, Sean Dyche has a crop of seriously mis-firing strikers. Currently, none of the Barnes, Wood, Rodriguez or Vydra quartet look remotely capable of scoring goals in sufficient quantities to haul the Clarets back into matches once they fall behind or to improve on a one-goal lead. The upshot is that Burnley are spending far too long manning the defensive barricades.

    Typically, Burnley don’t mind defending, they are usually comfortable without the ball and throughout the season to date they haven’t conceded very many goals, certainly not once Mee and Tarkowski resumed their partnership in the centre of the Clarets defence. But as we saw in this week’s two matches, that means nothing if there is no effective counterpunch.

    Burnley without doubt, played reasonably well against a Manchester United team whose hideous away strip caused them to resemble a herd of zebras, and although outclassed in the second half, the Clarets were never completely out of a game decided by Paul Pogba’s deflected volley. Indeed, a late flurry of activity in the United goalmouth almost rescued a point.

    Yesterday afternoon against West Ham, Burnley’s deficiencies were laid bare. A rare defensive miss-communication between Mee and Tarkowski, aided and abetted by a statuesque Robbie Brady on the far post, allowed Michail Antonio the easiest of close-range finishes and he duly obliged to give the Hammers a lead they hardly looked likely to surrender.

    Thereafter, Burnley had periods where they huffed and puffed, but couldn’t summon sufficient threat to seriously unease Fabianski in the Hammers goal.

    Burnley’s one-dimensional attacking play is deeply frustrating to watch. Far too many balls are played square or (worse still) backwards; no incisive runs are coming in behind the defence and a crazy reliance on crosses being delivered from obtuse angles, which are meat and drink to any competent Premier League defensive unit.

    The ball is now well and truly in the court of the new owners. It is reported the Clarets’ new Chairman Alan Pace has tested positive for Covid 19, and I am sure Burnley fans everywhere wish him a speedy recovery. Nonetheless, he and his colleagues at the Velocity Sports Partnership must now make good on their promise of transfer funds in the current transfer window.

    Burnley are seriously in need of a midfield player with vision and a range of passes, in addition to a speedy and aggressive striker with an instinct for goals. A class right back in the mould of Kieran Trippier would do Sean Dyche and his beleaguered squad a world of good too.

    Regular readers will be aware that I afforded the new owners a cautious welcome. They now face their first big test. If they are to maintain the trust and goodwill of the Burnley supporters, and win over doubters such as myself, and secure the eight further victories required to maintain Premier League status; they must support Sean Dyche with deeds, not words.

    A thoroughly down in the dumps Dave Thornley, urges the Clarets new owners to splash the cash. (TEC).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    4,249
    Can't disagree with any of that except to say two strikers would be preferable.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by kritichris View Post
    Can't disagree with any of that except to say two strikers would be preferable.
    Greedy.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    18,667
    We need a proper right winger and at least one new striker. Bye Vyds

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    12,744
    We need better pies and also to offer peas and gravy.

    And, maybe, a nice selection of post pie cakes.

    It is beyond time that Casper was offered the catering job.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    785
    Unfortunately, I remember going onto Turf Moor, when it was not whether we might win, but how many goals we would win by.
    The only teams in the then first division who could be considered our near equals were Ipswich Town, Tottenham Hotspur and Wolverhampton Wanderers.

    Those were great days and there was no talk of going back to basics.
    The mantra of Sean Dyche is that we need to stop our opponents from scoring at all costs by defending in depth and then hopefully try to nick a goal. This may work if you have players with some pace who can break quickly out of the defensive setup, but our problem is we do not have anyone with that type of pace. Instead ,we appear to try and rely on hoofing the ball forward in the hope that one of our out of form strikers might win the ball and hold it up until our average midfield players can arrive on the scene.

    I cannot imagine that Sean Dyche would like to have another relegation on his CV, nor that Alan Pace would like to see the club being relegated in the first few months of his chairmanship.

    We now have two weeks to bring in one or more players who can lead to us scoring more goals. Hopefully if the club is successful in avoiding relegation then at the end of this season we would need a good clear out in order to move forward.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    21,935
    Quote Originally Posted by Vintage Claret View Post
    We now have two weeks to bring in one or more players who can lead to us scoring more goals. Hopefully if the club is successful in avoiding relegation then at the end of this season we would need a good clear out in order to move forward.
    Can't argue with that VC, but exactly the same thing has been posted in the three previous Januaries, and nothing has ever happened. Despite new owners it looks like nothing is going to happen again.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    7,305
    .


    Yesterday afternoon against West Ham, Burnley’s deficiencies were laid bare. A rare defensive miss-communication between Mee and Tarkowski, aided and abetted by a statuesque Robbie Brady on the far post, allowed Michail Antonio the easiest of close-range finishes.....
    Those deficiencies have been present all season: a lack of imagination and impetus going forward; a tactical approach from Sean Dyche that is too inflexible....


    http://www.clarets-mad.co.uk/news/tm...47/index.shtml

    to err is human....they're not machines, but it seems, so heavily reliant are we on a part of the mechanism working like S.Ds 60 grand swiss watch - that the hands have seized....am not going to dwell on that that we're pretty much all in agreement with....but if this is a case of chickens come home to roost - its not for the production of eggs.



  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    5,301
    Yesterday afternoon against West Ham, Burnley’s deficiencies were laid bare. A rare defensive miss-communication between Mee and Tarkowski, aided and abetted by a statuesque Robbie Brady on the far post, allowed Michail Antonio the easiest of close-range finishes.....
    Those deficiencies have been present all season: a lack of imagination and impetus going forward; a tactical approach from Sean Dyche that is too inflexible.

    A series of blunders, were made at those moments just before Antonio scored. When the ball was played through to Bower, all he could do is advance to the corner, Pieters was with him so Bower at that moment did not cause any threat. Plus Mee was behind them and Tarks was with Antonio. We could add at that moment there seemed to be no danger. I have to add Lowton was out of position and running back to help out.
    But mistakes followed, Lawton should have realised there was no real threat. But instead of taking the West Ham player on his left ,running along the line, he ran to help out in the central defence. Namely 3 Burnley players to West Hams 2. The only option was for Bower to pass to the player running along the line ,which Lawton could have covered seconds before, but now that winger(?) had 10 yards to operate, as he took the pass from Bower. Then that moment changed the danger to us. It changed everything.
    Bower crossed the goal line and was not in play, but Pieters stood 2 yards from the line ,which could have left any West Ham player ON-side, he did not know this as he was watching the ball as it was about to be crossed in the middle of our defence. Fortunately for us nothing came about ,but he should have known to move back so as not to leave any West Ham player ON-side.

    Here now I do not know but a player should be giving out commands to other players like, ''cover him ,take him ''etc. It can not be that all players are doing what they think, esp in defence. Or Mee or Tarks! Just before the ball is crossed into our defence Tarks looks behind and sees Brady coming in. The question is did he say anything to Brady ? (Already Vladimir Coufal was now inside the penalty area) if not then Brady could have covered, or moved closer to Antonio?
    More errors! Unfortunately Mee jumped to head the ball, behind him Tarks. I am sure Tarks had judged the flight of the ball and was about to head it, could he have shouted to Mee ''leave it?''
    The rest is history ,Tarks was some 3 yards in front of Antonio and nothing now he could do to stop it. Brady was relaxed certainly not looking like a defender, and why he did not think to get in front of Antonio ,we will never know? The video is here : Just saying like......But do the players see the video and learn??

    https://youtu.be/bA7DfG15XTQ

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •