All appears great with this and I applaud his passionate speech raining against both sides of the media distorting events to suit their own narrative.Originally Posted by the_idiotb_stardson
But...
Doesn't he do exactly that by distorting the presenter's attempt to clarify what the allegtations about doctored evidence were into an outraged accusation that she was defending the doctoring of the evidence as being 'only small'?!
He concluded that the presenter "asked a slanted question that was set up for them to say 'it's ok for them to cheat', that was your question. That it's ok for them to cheat a little bit"
Look back at her asking the question (about 2 mins 30 onwards) and she simply read back the list of the doctored docs for the benefit of the viewers. Where was the slant that he accused her of??
His words of outrage against the media distorting truth would ring a bit more true if he didn't do the exact same thing himself in the same interview?! Other than that, he was great!
Reply With Quote