I can't and to be honest I don't want it to now we've seen how these guy operate, what concerns me though is Stephen Pearce told us all the paperwork had been signed and we're just waiting for the money and then it would be complete, that didn't happen because the backer pulled out allegedly, this time Mel said it had gone as far as us being obligated to sell and the Sheikh being obligated to buy so that ties in with what Stephen Pearce told us but this is what I don't understand - surely if the backer has pulled out and the Sheikh can't go through with the purchase then surely thats a breach of contract so why are both parties obligated, surely the Sheikh can't keep us hanging on indefinately, there has to come a point in time where the deal is off and we either sue or just move on, why are we still obligated to sell to him if he's broken the contract?