Originally Posted by
pip_y
Thanks for the explanation. In honesty I don’t want to read the other stuff so I won’t pay for the full paper. However with the economic climate being what it is I fully understand why there was a need for what I consider a small charge. Paul’s articles were well created, informative and he has the support of the club., not like a few years back when Advertiser staff were banned. As Others have rightly said it’s an individuals choice if you pay the 20p which I have chosen to do because I think Paul’s articles are value for money especially as that 20p buys you access for 24 hours - it’s not 20p per article. I will miss his posting not because of the missing link but rather that his posts went on to stimulate debate on the article itself. How many wanted to know if we would appeal the red card? Paul said we were in in his article, I read that before I picked that faint glimmer of hope up anywhere else! The man is in the know. How fickle were are at turning good reliable information away. Paul sorely missed by me.