I think the Knight substitution basically worked - despite the goals coming then, the game was much more even after it.
Ultimately I don’t think we lost yesterday because of anything IB did or didn’t do tactically, they’re just a better team than we are. I do agree on the Griffiths signing, he’s just adding to the problems in midfield rather than doing anything to solve them.
I'm sure you're joking but I'm sitting with my arms crossed with little faith in Mr Burchnall. Getting to half time at 0-0 would not have been failiure. Weakening our already weak midfield to add an extra striker didn't look like an act of genius. Putting DKE on, pushing Enzio up for Griffiths would have been more pragmatic and not just in hindsight. Enzio was getting slaughtered down that wing.
This^^^
Don't get me wrong, I think Enzio is brilliant but does he offer enough, often enough to warrant the wages we all assume he is on? We either need to use him more effectively or find someone else. As Jacob says, chances are he may well not choose to stay anyway.
This brings a single tear to my eye and makes me feel a little warm inside to read Davy type this words.
Of course fans should judge him after games, as you would judge individual player perfomances and the game as a whole. Analysis of games post match is a big part of NCM.
But naturally you can only apply nominal weight on the opinion of the new manager after just a handful of games.
Agree. He's better than our other options but like Dennis never has justified his handsome weekly wage, although he got a lot closer than Kristian did. As Jacob said must be on a huge wage for this level and even played in his correct most effective position we can't be playing one or two players disproportionate excessive wages.