After looking deeply into the Social Economic theory of Prout
''ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED??''
Norder: @h. I can not agree with Democracy! Not just any Tom Dick and Harry, grabbing the reins of power. For sure it is the best system we have as yet ,but we can better it, alias ''PROUT.'' The ideals of Prout require a leadership of 'spirtual moralists!''
Then political voting. what good is it? What we need is 'economic' voting. Lets look at an example, the mainstay of Prouts Economic Theory is Co-operatives. Workers co-operatives were all can have a say in the day to day running of the work place
Ex: A Co-op has been buying some commodity at $10,000 p ton, a worker has found that they can buy the same quality somewhere else at $750 p ton. That difference now gets ploughed back into all the workers earnings.
An Engineer can design better machine's than the existing ones so again profit is made and wages fed back into workers wages. In a capitalistic framework some workers could be laid off ! In a consumer economy like Prout's, better salary's, less working hours, all can be achieved ,same number of workers.
Shorter working hours would cause a problem, therefore educational study could be made available, car maintenance ,languages, art, woodwork, sport etc etc? (Whatever all free!) Then more time also for the family.
I used to work with someone that told me, he does not see his youngest daughter, just weekends, as she is in bed and later he comes home from work. We should take a look at the Socio-Economic Theory.
https://prout.info
After looking deeply into the Social Economic theory of Prout
''ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED??''
No other political party in the UK can match the Tories voracious appetite for cronyism...
https://inews.co.uk/news/hancock-acc...54?ITO=newsnow
It really is rather appalling would you say chaps?
We do have some naughty boys here, is there a melody? Some song ''I'm still standing?'' Ah yes, Elton John, he must have wrote that with ''Bibi '' in mind.
You have either a very selective memory or a short one BT, possibly both. The expenses scandal in 2009, Speaker Martin resigned, Cabinet Ministers Jacqui Smith, Hazel Blears, Kitty Usher, Geoff Hoon, David Laws, backbenchers Chapman, Chaytor, Cohen, Devine, Gibson, Illsley, McShame, Moffat, Moran, Morley, in the Lords, Baron Clarke, Baroness Thornton, Baroness Uddin, the expenses scandal did for all of them some ended up in prison.
None of the above were Tories.
Remember Tessa Jowell, married to international tax lawyer David Mills, and the £400,000 mortgage paid off by a gift from Berlusconi, who Mills had recently spoken up for a in a corruption case. Tessa, bless her, claimed to know nothing about it, and said she didn't even know the mortgage had been paid off. Tessa was not a Tory.
Remember Two Jags Union owned flat, which he was paying a peppercorn rent for. He moved out to his grace and favour apartment in Admiralty Arch, but allowed his son to live in his Union flat rent free. No one asked the Union members who were subbing the flat what they thought about this arrangement. Two Jags was not a Tory.
Remember the 'Loans for Lordships' scandal investigated by Scotland Yard ? Remember Lord Levy, aka Mr Cashpoint ? £1 million loan from the CEO of Capita, a company with billions in government contracts, £2 million from David Sainsbury, 17 out of 22 people who had donated over £100,000 to the Labour party received an honour, all but one of those who had donated over £1 million received a peerage. No Tories were involved in the above.
I could go on all night with Labour sleaze stories BT, I could put up two for every one you can put up about the Tories, and still have plenty to spare.