When you are officially a bigger sleazebag than Tony Blair, you know he's rotten to the core.
How much money do these dudes really need to siphon off from the Treasury before they have enough?
When you are officially a bigger sleazebag than Tony Blair, you know he's rotten to the core.
How much money do these dudes really need to siphon off from the Treasury before they have enough?
It seems, if half I've read is true that there have been a lot of deals for mates done during the pandemic where normal contract rules have been suspended leading to little or no accountability and competitiveness. I'm just amazed the Cameron deal has come to light, Boris must have slipped up somewhere.
Boris and Cameron are not besties, I believe they hate each other's guts, going back to when they were at Eton together, I doubt Boris is losing any sleep over the fact that Cameron's in the ****.
On the cronyism/sleaze/corruption story, what's new, it goes on whichever government is in power, whoever the politicians are. What is the House of Lords but a monument to cronyism, stuffed to the gunnels with Tory, Labour and LibDems gravy train riders on their £300 a day expenses just for signing in.
A headline about corrupt politicians is about as surprising as one saying, 'Burnley in relegation battle', they turn up regularly.
What gets me he had his day in the nose bag, but then decided he was not sated and went hell for leather for another session and to hell with the morality.
Footnote: Epitome of a misnomer; politicians and morality...
Attachment 18844
BT
Leadership is important to the well-being of a society. Leaders reflect the values of the people. If superficial qualities of leadership appeal to voters, they will select inept and corrupt individuals to lead. But if the populace possesses high values and high aspirations, they will put into office leaders having a noble character and a spirit of service. The ideal leader is one with, a deeply moral and spiritual personality devoted to the collective welfare and established in neo-humanistic values.
You mean like this guy Balan..?
Attachment 18845
Ha ha Bt
You have got to be kidding with that one , morally wrong - IRA - Hamas supporting - nobody.
Norder: @h. I can not agree with Democracy! Not just any Tom Dick and Harry, grabbing the reins of power. For sure it is the best system we have as yet ,but we can better it, alias ''PROUT.'' The ideals of Prout require a leadership of 'spirtual moralists!''
Then political voting. what good is it? What we need is 'economic' voting. Lets look at an example, the mainstay of Prouts Economic Theory is Co-operatives. Workers co-operatives were all can have a say in the day to day running of the work place
Ex: A Co-op has been buying some commodity at $10,000 p ton, a worker has found that they can buy the same quality somewhere else at $750 p ton. That difference now gets ploughed back into all the workers earnings.
An Engineer can design better machine's than the existing ones so again profit is made and wages fed back into workers wages. In a capitalistic framework some workers could be laid off ! In a consumer economy like Prout's, better salary's, less working hours, all can be achieved ,same number of workers.
Shorter working hours would cause a problem, therefore educational study could be made available, car maintenance ,languages, art, woodwork, sport etc etc? (Whatever all free!) Then more time also for the family.
I used to work with someone that told me, he does not see his youngest daughter, just weekends, as she is in bed and later he comes home from work. We should take a look at the Socio-Economic Theory.
https://prout.info
After looking deeply into the Social Economic theory of Prout
''ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED??''