Can you point out where the article says that the decisions touched upon were made 'as there are plenty of black actors that need the work also'? I can see where an actress is concerned about 'engaging in an act of erasure of Black people' and one who believes in a monopoly where 'people of color should always voice people of color', but can't see where you got your interpretation.
The reference to the Boleyn film goes back to the comment made by Grist earlier in the thread. If it is authenticity that we seek (as per Kristen Bell's 'more accurate portrayal') then surely the use of a black actress for the part is far 'worse' than the use of white people to voice black characters? I had no idea that Cleveland Brown was voiced by a white person until the Forbes article told me. The historical discrepancy in the Boleyn film will be obvious to all but blind people.
I'm almost proud to say that I had given absolutely no thought to the colour of the person voicing Cleveland Brown for the simple reason that it it doesn't matter.
As I have said, I care not whether Boleyn is played by a black actress. The sign of a good performance is that the audience would quickly not notice such an irrelevance.
I am unsurprised that you can't see the controversy in the Forbes article (particularly in light of the interpretation that you have applied to it) but the danger for people who oppose discrimination in the nonsense that it touches upon is that it plays right into the hands of people who argue that ''they' want special treatment at our expense'. And it is an argument that can resonate, gain purchase and harden attitudes.
It isn't just in respect of racial discrimination where the 'woke' (for want of a better term) are damaging their own cause:
https://variety.com/2020/film/news/h...lm-1234699605/
Maybe you will interperet that article as Berry stepping down because there are 'plenty of trans actors that neeed the work also'. I see it as someone who has been put under pressure to give up some work that she had obtained (although she did make it easier by wandering into a 'misgendering' minefield).
I note your reference to culture wars. That expression is the new 'racist' - the latest label from the Left to try to shut down arguments that they don't like. The truth is the Left have been fighting culture wars for the last fif**** years or so - to the point where it is just about all that Labour does (something that the 'red wall' voters have noticed). The left are now raging (see what I did there) about the right stepping on their territory (in every sense) and seizing the agenda that they have driven.