New interpretation of contact.

So if you’ve got clear contact that has a consequence then that’s what you have got to penalise - easy enough or is it ?
While the change of emphasis should mean that attackers who initiate or exaggerate contact will not be rewarded, referees will be on the lookout to award penalties where there is clear & meaningful contact but players stay on their feet.

The on field officials and VARs will be told to establish 'clear' contact & whether it has a 'consequence' and whether an attacking player has tried to use that contact to win a penalty.

Well - good luck on that but in honesty it really is turning into a non-contact scenario in the box.As my younger goalkeeping brother said to me 'it'll just add another keeping dimension to his game to work on' and will leave keepers more exposed with the lack of defensive tackling/blocking.

Thoughts anyone.