+ Visit Motherwell FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Very meh

  1. #1

    Very meh

    No idea what we were trying to do today and it showed the madness of 'take the game to the Old Firm' - for about the first time this season we started with more of the ball, the better of the territory and yet Celtic had the freedom of the park on the break and their goal was utterly inevitable. Why GA decided this was the game of all games to bring in a more attacking/ball playing midfielder and scrap his obsession with discipline and shape I will never fathom.

    Anyway, moving on we urgently need Kelly to stop booting the ball into the net and to switch to our best back four on paper to see how they do - SOD, Ojala, Johansen, Carroll. Grimshaw needs bombed out of the midfield with two of O'Hara, Donnelly, Goss joining Slattery. And we need to scrap the idea of playing three across the top - KVV and Watt, whether up front of in the hole, need to be central and one other, any of them, can be the second striker who also drifts out to give a bit of width.

    A point will be a great result next week and with St Mirren also hitting form our good start is in danger of being thrown away.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    4,458
    I really don't get the obsession some fans have with Slattery - he was 100% culpable for the Turnbull goal (totally lost his man when Grimshaw smelt danger trying to close the previous pass). I can see Slattery's able to play a pass, but ATM in our midfield, there's no point in having a passer 'cos we miss the MF out altogether. The jigsaw puzzle is becoming more complex. That said, we looked solid at the back again and lost to 2 great strikes. Had the deffo pen been given I reckon our chances of a 2-2 were slightly more than 50/50.

  3. #3
    Slattery also wins tonnes of fouls (like he should have had before their goal) and is very clever at breaking up play. He's by no means a superstar but he's clearly our best midfielder by a substantial distance.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,206
    Our front 3 cause opposition minimal problems.
    Playing 2 wide players (Woolery/Amaluzor or Roberts) with Watt thru centre has proven to be ineffective.
    Not over enthused both Woolery and Amaluzor who are more often AWOL


    IMO and selection restricted current squad, play a recognised No9 who can cause a defence problems - Van Even or Shields. Watt in never a No9 but playing his best football since signed. Therefore, play Watt alongside recognised No9 (Van Veen or Shields) and ONE wide player, preferably Roberts.

    Forgot the long ball and play thru the mid-field comprising of Slattery, Goss and O’Hara/Maguire
    Grimshaw resigned to bench as although a grafter, creates hee-haw.
    Donnelly is much too slow but if needs must, sat beside Grimshaw on the bench

    I’d also send SOD who is vastly overrated to a finishing school as performances recently been woeful

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by dasdeid View Post
    Our front 3 cause opposition minimal problems.
    Playing 2 wide players (Woolery/Amaluzor or Roberts) with Watt thru centre has proven to be ineffective.
    Not over enthused both Woolery and Amaluzor who are more often AWOL


    IMO and selection restricted current squad, play a recognised No9 who can cause a defence problems - Van Even or Shields. Watt in never a No9 but playing his best football since signed. Therefore, play Watt alongside recognised No9 (Van Veen or Shields) and ONE wide player, preferably Roberts.
    What makes it even more bizarre now is that we stumbled into the equivalent last season and sparked our good run - Cole as the main striker through the middle, Watt off him in the centre and Roberts as the second striker who also gave a bit of width. Whether we want to insist on that still being 4-3-3 on the old tactics board or we call it anything else I don't care but the insistence on the wide three up top, which barely worked even when we were digging out results, is infuriating.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    4,458
    Agreed on the Slattery comment ... 'our best midfielder'. Problem is he's not allowed to show his progressive play as there's nowt beside him.
    Grimshaw = stopper and breaker of thru balls
    O'Hara = could be a player one Saturday, then non-existent the next game; he's unreliable
    Goss = haven't seen anything from him in games that would've merited starting, or staying on the full 90 mins on Saturday
    Who else ATM ??

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •