+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Keith Curle sacked again

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    11,077
    Quote Originally Posted by the_anticlough View Post
    What I remember from Curle's home games was 4-3-3 but all 3 midfielders held and the full-backs didn't get forward either. It was probably the most boring and frustrating stuff I've ever watched at Meadow Lane
    Yet we got to the dizzy heights of 7th in league one under him, what we would give to be there again.
    His football was boring though.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    7,329
    If I remember correctly it was under KC that we probably saw the first use of stats to assess player performance. Problem was this focussed on passes, qty of passes per player and completion/success rate.

    This meant the players spent ages aimlessly passing the ball to each other in order to get their stats up.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    34,464
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Don_ORiordan View Post
    Yes. But look at the talent gulf….Curle had the likes of Campbell-Ryce, Judge, Hughes, Liddle, Bishop, Sheehan, Bart…..

    McParland had……Canham, Tann, Strachan, Mayo, Hamshaw…..
    Curle certainly had a better squad at his disposal, but that wasn't the question. The most boring season I've ever witnessed at Meadow Lane was when McParland was in charge. Thordarson would come second, Curle would be among the also-rans.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Posts
    456
    Quote Originally Posted by ncfcog View Post
    If I remember correctly it was under KC that we probably saw the first use of stats to assess player performance. Problem was this focussed on passes, qty of passes per player and completion/success rate.

    This meant the players spent ages aimlessly passing the ball to each other in order to get their stats up.
    Exactly my experience of “metrics” in an entirely different field. Metrics were in fashion, so they were introduced in a typically half-baked manner, and predictably had unpredicted side effects.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    11,288
    Those 3 would probably be my podium finishes, with Thordarson taking the gold medal for sheer dullness at Meadow Lane.

    Curle certainly had far better players at his disposal that he wasted (a criticism correctly aimed at Ardley more recently).

    Thankfully away from the home faithful we were very effective and I saw a couple of beauties under Keith's stewardship in various away ends. The best being that 4-3 win at Adams Park to conclude that season and very narrowly miss out on the play offs. At Meadow Lane as we all know it was dire stuff.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    810
    I remember that day well, cracking game only spoilt a few hours later by Stevenage getting a point at Shef Utd.
    Shrek & the banana being tackled by the coppers in our goal mouth when the 4th went in… priceless.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    13,053
    Quote Originally Posted by the_anticlough View Post
    What I remember from Curle's home games was 4-3-3 but all 3 midfielders held and the full-backs didn't get forward either. It was probably the most boring and frustrating stuff I've ever watched at Meadow Lane
    I think it's being generous to say he played with three forwards at home. All I remember is a lot of slow sideways passing, and when we did get the ball into the box, Yoann Arquin was often the lone target. Away from home, parking the bus and hitting teams on the counter worked well and we built up an extraordinary away record, but Curle's stubborn refusal to play a second striker rather than a midfielder at home cost us many results. With an away record like we had, even a moderately good home record would have rocketed us towards the top of the table, but he wouldn't budge and it cost him his job.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    5,979
    Quote Originally Posted by Elite_Pie View Post
    Curle certainly had a better squad at his disposal, but that wasn't the question. The most boring season I've ever witnessed at Meadow Lane was when McParland was in charge. Thordarson would come second, Curle would be among the also-rans.
    No Colin Murphy? Jeez he was awful in his last season, would have rather watched paint dry

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    17,507
    Murphy was responsible for me not renewing my season ticket for the first time. We were then relegated with the worst season's set of results ever. I didn't go regularly again until Sam got us back up.

    Curle was the reason my son lost interest in Notts. I was bored stiff as well but didn't complain too much on here at the time because results always come first. The performances however eventually caught up with us and the falling gates forced Trew's hand. Appointing a manager previously sacked by Mansfield Town still, to this day, seems unbelievable to me, but I think it was always destined to end in tears under the Trews whoever the manager was. Ideally we should try and forget who's running the club as much as possible and not identify the club with the owners too much, otherwise it begins to make supporting the club difficult when the the owners turn out to be so unpleasant. The Trews got the position they deserved in the end, sadly the fans had to suffer as well.

    Curle might have done much better and been far more entertaining under competent owners, but he hasn't exactly set the football world on fire since he left. I think it is safe to say by now that he isn't L1 standard, fairly decent in L2 with a stable club, but no higher.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •