It will not go away.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

And you all wonder why global anti-Semitism is rife...

https://www.timesofisrael.com/jerusa...f-18-arrested/

[The Bedlington Terrier]

I meant exactly what I posted BT, 'anti-semitism is still rife amongst British Muslims and the Loony Left', a separate sentence, a separate paragraph. How on earth you have deduced from that simple statement of fact, that I am suggesting ISIS and Momentum had teamed up under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn to attack a synagogue in the USA I have no idea.

Are you on the meds again ?

I wondered how long it would take for you to blame Corbyn mon ami.

Meanwhile the evictions, the fascism, the madness continues...

https://www.timesofisrael.com/jerusa...f-18-arrested/

[The Bedlington Terrier]

I’m only surmising but I reckon he got in Because he’s a Muslim ?

Having wasted countless hours of my life in the "Alien" queue at various US entry points, I can't imagine that is true army88.

Seems bloody strange to me. Set-up perhaps?

[Balanbam00]

BT: Of course here you would have to see documents ? Nothing can be said without going deep into this story ( post 141).

At the Ottoman census of 1905, the Sheikh Jarrah, Nahiya (sub-district) consisted of the Muslim quarters of Sheikh Jarrah, Hayy el-Husayni, Wadi el-Joz and Bab ez-Zahira, {and the Jewish quarters of Shim'on Hatsadik and Nahalat Shim'on.} take note!

Its population was counted as 167 Muslim families (est. 1,250 people),[11] 97 Jewish families, and 6 Christian families.

Before 1948, Jews had purchased property in the West Bank. Jordan later passed the Custodian of Enemy Property Law and set a Custodian of Enemy Property to administer the property, amounting to some 30,000 dunums or about 5 percent of the total area of the West Bank.
In 1956, the Jordanian government moved 28 Palestinian families into Sheikh Jarrah who were displaced from their homes in Israeli-held Jerusalem during the 1948 War.

This was done in accordance with a deal reached between Jordan and UNRWA which stipulated that the refugee status of the families would be renounced in exchange for titles for ownership of the new houses after three years of residency, but the exchange did not take place.
During the Six-Day War of 1967, Israel captured East Jerusalem, including Sheikh Jarrah.
Under international law, the area, effectively annexed by Israel, is a part of the occupied Palestinian territories.

( What is international law? Is it the UN with that body having some 56 Muslim or Islamic nations ?)
The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation founded in 1969 has 57 members, 56 of which are also member states of the United Nations with 49 countries being Muslim majority countries. i e: Example of smaller states/Nations ,and percentage of Muslims

Albania 56%, Afghanistan 99%, Bahrain 70%,Benin 23%, Brunei 75%, Comoros 98%, Djibouti 96%, Gabon 11%, Gambia 95%, Guinea-Bissau 45%, Kyrgyzstan 88%, Oman 85%, Qatar 67% Chad 55%, Guinea 84%, Guyana 6.4%, Lebanon 61%, Mali 94%, Maldives 98%, Mauritania 99%, Palestine 97% Tajikistan 76%, Togo 14% Turkmenistan 93%, Somalia 99%, Yemen 99%, United Arab Emirates 76% Sierra Leone 78%, Suriname 15%

Jewish groups have sought to gain property in Sheikh Jarrah claiming they were once owned by Jews, including the Shepherd Hotel compound, the Mufti's Vineyard, the building of the el-Ma'amuniya school, the Simeon the Just/Shimon HaTzadik compound, and the Nahlat Shimon neighbourhood.

[sinkov]

I wondered how long it would take for you to blame Corbyn mon ami.

What is it you're actually on mon ami ?

[The Bedlington Terrier]

What is it you're actually on mon ami ?

Worry not sinkov, a dose is on its way to you via DHL, as we speak.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Where's "Rocket Man" when you need him..?

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/n...&ocid=msedgntp

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Angela Rayner will have a field day with this. Thank you Nusrat Ghani...

https://www.lbc.co.uk/politics/musli...ause-of-faith/

[sinkov]

Still not gone away.

"The BBC must confront its long-held prejudices towards Jews. It is unimaginable that it would take the corporation so long to apologise for grievous victim-blaming on any other beleaguered minority"


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...-towards-jews/

"When Corbyn’s Labour kept having trouble with anti-Semitism, the Left seemed incapable of grasping why. The party stood for anti-racism, after all! What they couldn’t see, of course, was that anti-Semitic behaviour occurred because of a pervasive, deep-seated loathing of Israel - and the two are often linked. The anti-Israel stance itself stemmed from the political convictions of the 1970s far-Left, the circles from which Corbyn emerged.

A similar problem underpins the BBC’s inability to amend its behaviour towards Jews. It just doesn’t get it. The community was deeply wounded by its reporting of the attack by a group of Muslim men on a Hannukah bus carrying Jews in November.

Instead of calling it what it was - an anti-Semitic attack, replete with what appeared to be a Hitler salute, the BBC accused those in the bus of provoking the attack with an anti-Muslim slur. Yet when analysed externally, no such slur was found.

As Marie van der Zyl, president of the Board of Deputies observed: “The supposed slur, which the BBC insists is there, is nothing but fiction. This raises serious questions about deep-seated biases within the BBC towards Israelis, and towards Jews in general.”

It is unimaginable, given all this, that it would take the BBC as long to apologise as it has for such grievous victim-blaming on any other beleaguered minority. And then, to add insult to injury, to issue a non-apology, as it did last week. Only after their Executive Complaints Unit partially upheld complaints did it apologise, though the BBC rejected the characterisation of victim blaming, and upheld the use of ‘alleged’ in describing the abuse.

There’s nothing new here. In October, Dreyfus was briefly described as ‘the notorious Jewish spy’ in a blurb for the BBC’s Paris Police 1900. The recent synagogue hostage-taking in Texas was disappointingly reported with barely a mention of anti-Semitism.

The BBC’s problem with Jews goes back several generations, and, as with Corbyn’s Labour, the reason lies in the slow but sure percolation of the most toxic parts of left-wing culture of the 1970s. Only when the BBC confronts its anti-Israel bias will it find that it makes fewer slips in its handling of Jews."

[wanderlust]

Still not gone away.

"The BBC must confront its long-held prejudices towards Jews. It is unimaginable that it would take the corporation so long to apologise for grievous victim-blaming on any other beleaguered minority"


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...-towards-jews/

"When Corbyn’s Labour kept having trouble with anti-Semitism, the Left seemed incapable of grasping why. The party stood for anti-racism, after all! What they couldn’t see, of course, was that anti-Semitic behaviour occurred because of a pervasive, deep-seated loathing of Israel - and the two are often linked. The anti-Israel stance itself stemmed from the political convictions of the 1970s far-Left, the circles from which Corbyn emerged.

A similar problem underpins the BBC’s inability to amend its behaviour towards Jews. It just doesn’t get it. The community was deeply wounded by its reporting of the attack by a group of Muslim men on a Hannukah bus carrying Jews in November.

Instead of calling it what it was - an anti-Semitic attack, replete with what appeared to be a Hitler salute, the BBC accused those in the bus of provoking the attack with an anti-Muslim slur. Yet when analysed externally, no such slur was found.

As Marie van der Zyl, president of the Board of Deputies observed: “The supposed slur, which the BBC insists is there, is nothing but fiction. This raises serious questions about deep-seated biases within the BBC towards Israelis, and towards Jews in general.”

It is unimaginable, given all this, that it would take the BBC as long to apologise as it has for such grievous victim-blaming on any other beleaguered minority. And then, to add insult to injury, to issue a non-apology, as it did last week. Only after their Executive Complaints Unit partially upheld complaints did it apologise, though the BBC rejected the characterisation of victim blaming, and upheld the use of ‘alleged’ in describing the abuse.

There’s nothing new here. In October, Dreyfus was briefly described as ‘the notorious Jewish spy’ in a blurb for the BBC’s Paris Police 1900. The recent synagogue hostage-taking in Texas was disappointingly reported with barely a mention of anti-Semitism.

The BBC’s problem with Jews goes back several generations, and, as with Corbyn’s Labour, the reason lies in the slow but sure percolation of the most toxic parts of left-wing culture of the 1970s. Only when the BBC confronts its anti-Israel bias will it find that it makes fewer slips in its handling of Jews."

https://rense.com/general38/brits.htm
"Near Total Zionist Jewish Control Of The British Media" written in 2002 is an equally biased perspective from the crackpot American neo-fascist but he is correct in saying that all the major TV channels and newspapers had Jewish ownership and/or leadership.

And yet it is interesting that the recent stories of entrenched Islamaphobia in the Tory party were demoted by Partygate.