.
you'd like to hear Garlicks view - Plug ?
his view...him a businessman - I would imagine he'll be patting himeslf on the back, and raising a glass to those years of reward - mostly helped along by S.D and the "plan"....and I guess, if the writing wasn't on the wall, then likely he'd lstill be the boss....but they'd've worked it out, seen what was coming and what would be expected of them - but no more room at the inn, even for wriggling....of course, that doesn't help us any....changes that should have been made, weren't , and thats why the arrival of the Mormon business consortiium was for many, a tonic - but could we really expect an immediate transition, well we could...but it wasn't logical, not when Burnley have had years of the same, with a manager thats been at the centre of it...and there's another thing, who's the slow change for, is it more for the manager than the team ?
as he recently said (post Leeds)...
The other responsibility is not to be reliant on Maxwel. When you are a footballer you can’t just look at Maxwel
Before we had Maxwel we had seasons in the Premier League and the players who have got us there, kept us there and kept delivering.
So let’s have it right, there are a lot of good players here who know what life is like without Maxwel so we have to make sure we are performing when he goes away.
Reliant on Maxwell...what does that mean, what are they looking at, and if they are, why is that a bad thing ?
Well, it could be because they'd like to be free'd up, but again...it'd upset the status quo, the machine think, that without, could prove our downfall, though as were are currently....seems there's nothing to lose, unless losing is the new plan...but at least there's other teams involved in that equation.