+ Visit Carlisle United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Unita Fortior will ensure that a new board of CUOSC is no better than now.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,601

    Unita Fortior will ensure that a new board of CUOSC is no better than now.

    We know that the Unita Fortior initiators are no more ethical and no more open to questions than the people who are currently on the board of CUOSC. Yet it is clear that these people and their sycophants will take over by actually being democratically elected.

    The proof of their ethics is the farce that occurred when Barry's account was not only deleted but all of his posts were deleted by "software glitch". Presumably his attemps to re-sign up were all not accepted by a similar software glitch. Subsequent questions were dealt with in a contemptuous manner. All kinds of crude deflection tactics were used, such as but not limited to, making a point of questioning the identity of the inquisitor, asking for a reason why the question was being asked [bizarre] and using childish scorn. Some questions on this subject were deleted by the moderators and also the accounts of those who asked questions were deleted.

    The eventually enlarged membership of CUOSC should be careful regarding its voting, should not be so sycophantic and should think for itself. The planned 'democratic coup' will result in a new board of CUOSC that will be a breath of fresh s­hit.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,532
    Quote Originally Posted by _Stefan_Kuntz View Post
    We know that the Unita Fortior initiators are no more ethical and no more open to questions than the people who are currently on the board of CUOSC. Yet it is clear that these people and their sycophants will take over by actually being democratically elected.

    The proof of their ethics is the farce that occurred when Barry's account was not only deleted but all of his posts were deleted by "software glitch". Presumably his attemps to re-sign up were all not accepted by a similar software glitch. Subsequent questions were dealt with in a contemptuous manner. All kinds of crude deflection tactics were used, such as but not limited to, making a point of questioning the identity of the inquisitor, asking for a reason why the question was being asked [bizarre] and using childish scorn. Some questions on this subject were deleted by the moderators and also the accounts of those who asked questions were deleted.

    The eventually enlarged membership of CUOSC should be careful regarding its voting, should not be so sycophantic and should think for itself. The planned 'democratic coup' will result in a new board of CUOSC that will be a breath of fresh s*hit.
    Firm.. but fair Stefan.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    20,224
    Maybe. But if you do nowt, nowt changes.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    3,677
    As an outsider but pretty much up to date with what happened to Barry I don't understand why his banning continually gets brought back up? I suspect that those who run things 'over there' got rid of him and closed ranks but I'm not sure why,was he a trouble maker or asked questions that they didn't like asked or summat? How come things haven't moved on now knowing that the people who run the forum can't be trusted and leave it at that? People get banned all the time so how come it continually gets mentioned?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,601
    Let's be clear about what is already beginning to happen, storm clouds gathering over CUOSC, shortly to be followed by the phoney war with slight disagreements between the two sides leading to a definitive split of CUOSC into two opposing factions, possibly three opposing factions consisting of the folk supporting the current CUOSC board, those supporting the intiators of Unita Fortior and those who are of independent clear mind wanting neither the incumbents nor the initiators of Unita Fortior to be on the CUOSC board.

    At the moment we can be somewhat amused by the ostensibly friendly manner in which the key members of the current CUOSC board and the initiators of Unita Fortior are behaving with regard to each other.

    The obvious war will be a bit of a grind because I believe that individual CUOSC board members are elected to serve a term of 3 years, then their board membership is subjected to an election process. They were not all elected at the same time, so some may be up for re-election in the current year, some next year and some the year after that. So even if they all fail to get re-elected that process will take 3 years. Of course CUOSC's board and their keenest supporters consist of several solicitors and accountants so you can be sure that they know the rules that can be used to favour the current CUOSC board.

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •