Reply With QuoteI applaud your crowbarring in of ‘Everton’, a tough one to include.
Good effortmin.
Hall Of Fame
I will see your 'overly careful' limerick ... and raise you thus ....Originally Posted by 57vintage
Bobby Clark, Henning Boel, Jim Hermiston,
Willie Miller, McLeish, Peter Hetherston.
Arthur Graham, Dave Robb
Well up tae the job,
Noo king joey has ****ed off tae Everton
Hall Of Fame
I applaud your crowbarring in of ‘Everton’, a tough one to include.
Good effortmin.
Hall Of Fame
I am an anarck heist.I will see your 'overly careful' limerick ... and raise you thus ....
Bobby Clark, Henning Boel, Jim Hermiston,
Willie Miller, McLeish, Peter Hetherston.
Arthur Graham, Dave Robb
Well up tae the job,
Noo king joey has ****ed off tae Everton
Hall Of Fame
All teams should play in beige and fans should not offend anyone, obviously offending anyone is judged by the self appointed moral minority.
Booooooooo.
Hall Of Fame
The International Board who make and amend The Laws are considering replacing throw-ins with kick-ins.
Send Neil Doncaster to me, and I’ll be happy to demonstrate the latter. Maybe even as a tag team with Shay Logan.
Hall Of Fame
Not really, they only talked about it. There are no plans for trials of kick ins.
Hall Of Fame
Arsene Wenger idea, still bitter about how Stoke used to beat them !
Hall Of Fame
New rool .... in order to finalise the recruitment of a player on loan within the same league division, the manager of the recruiting club is required to appear before a select SPFL panel and be witnessed sucking the dick or slurping on the groove of the parent club's chairperson (yes, I did edit that before posting)... to the complete, and stated satisfaction of said chairperson.
However, should the recruiting club commit to taking the player on loan with a view to buy, for a figure deemed fair at the time of the loan agreement, and subject to the will of said player* and recruiting club on cessation of the agreed loan period, then the manager of the recruiting club can keep his/her trap shut, and otherly genitalia free.
But. Should the parent club fail to co-operate, or renege on said 'with a view to buy' deal, then said player will return to parent club, that move finalised in similar terms to the straight loan deal, this time between parent club manager and recruiting club chairperson.
* Whatever the outcome, should said player not abide by the terms ... having been given more say than either club, then said player and agent will be required to 'kneel' before both club's chairpersons following similar procedural protocols, under similar terms to those laid down and ratified between parent club manager and recruiting club chairperson.
You follow? (OK slowcoach ... player and agent maybe unavailable for comment for a wee bit
In the spirit of transparency, all aspects of these deals will be recorded on video by a professional film crew and made available to interested parties on submission of an 'administration fee' and the signing of a non-disclosure order.
This ruling is effective immediately, but concerns have been voiced by the People Opposed to the Operation of Video Evidence and Surrveilance (POOVES) regarding the misconception of 'simulation'.
However, theoretical studies suggest that VAR would be essential in ensuring Fairness On Representation of Employers, Players, Legislators. Agents and Youth coaches (F.O.R.E.P.L.A.Y.).
A spokesperson for the SPFL has spoken in support of such utilisation of VAR stating:
"This is a decision we cannot afford, in any terms, to take lightly. The cost of wrong decisions BEAR an overwhelmingly greater cost than the implementation of VAR. Surely if we have taken the appropriate steps to assist match officials, it is only suitable that we LODGE an application.
"We will be LODGING an action against POOVES to be heard in open court and RA PEEPIL will decide whether or not F.O.R.E.P.L.A.Y. has any role concerning contractual obligations.
On being asked how much income SPFL expects to make from selling the videos, SPFL refused to SURRENDER any detail.
A spokesperson for F.O.R.E.P.L.A.Y. commented:
"We are all about transparency. We want the paying public to see from all angles. In a live game, football, rugby, tennis whatever, we want the viewing public to see more than the in situ live spectator.
"We want you to see more than the referee, and also see how/why the referee might make a decision from one standpoint - as compared to the 12 we offer viewers.
"VAR offers this ... and that is why we support VAR".
A representative of POOVES countered:
"The appeal of a football match is thus:
"Thousands gather, each watching from a different fraction of that 360 deg angle .... each sees the game differently ... each sees something a few thousand others will not. In a crowd of 10,000, maybe 5,000 will have the ability to see what the ref misses ... if they are actually watching ... if they scream 'penalty!' .... another 3000 will scream in agreement.
"VAR in football, we agree is correct.
"But VAR used to determine whether an aggrieved party concerned with a loan deal, by way of whether an oral s3x act has been contractually consummated is tantamount to inviting extra cameras to an event which is already being recorded, and to our collective mind, should not be shared.
"So it is with heavy heart that we say ... Long live SPFL ... but for now ... go F*CK yourselves!"
Last edited by NaeMairNeeps; 01-07-2022 at 05:09 AM.
Hall Of Fame
Latest rool ... any rool other than my brilliant suggestion regarding throw ins being replaced by kick ins should be regarded with a pinch ... or a fkn huge hod o' salt.... cos Ah'm up too late, drunk on apple n' carrot wine, an' dinna even ken fit time it is .... let alone how Ah'm gan tae fit some fkn kip in atween noo an' an impendin recordin session .... " Aah say ... it's only rock n' roll ... an' Ah like it!"
Hall Of Fame
🤣
Up early eday neeps,got a brew going?
Posting Permissions