The Wokeness Thread

[Andy_Faber]

deleted

[ramAnag]

Deleted

[Geoff Parkstone]

I think he may prefer to be known as a CB rather than a CD, particularly given his parent club lication

[Andy_Faber]

I think he may prefer to be known as a CB rather than a CD, particularly given his parent club lication

Subtle

[swaledale]

I think he may prefer to be known as a CB rather than a CD, particularly given his parent club lication

Maybe or perhaps he doesn't give a ****? Anyway a CD is necessarily gay!

Yes looks like the defence is almost sorted. Now we need a few up front I concur with MA on McGoldrick, though he is very useful player 9nterms of creating chances. Maybe Collins if we land him will be the goal scorer.

[Geoff Parkstone]

Maybe or perhaps he doesn't give a ****? Anyway a CD is necessarily gay!

I don't recall suggesting so either, just you leaping to conclusions

[Andy_Faber]

Maybe or perhaps he doesn't give a ****? Anyway a CD is necessarily gay!

.

Another thing you seem to get unusually and unnecessarily touchy about…

[swaledale]

Another thing you seem to get unusually and unnecessarily touchy about…

As is often the case with you, your wrong, I wasn't actually being unnecessarily touchy, merely adding a comment that actually the inference didn't necessarily stack up.

But in any case you and I were both wrong, because GP has said he didn't recall suggesting either. I'm hoping he will do me the favour of explaining what he was suggesting, as you know I do like to avoid misinterpreting what people post.

Rather like your and your "broadly" non racist friends its easy with vague sentences and obscure meaningless phrases to get the wrong end of the schtick (see what I did there?).

Still i do get a laugh at the fact that you jump to the wrong conclusion on most occasions when responding to a post of mine.

[Andy_Faber]

As is often the case with you, your wrong, I wasn't actually being unnecessarily touchy, merely adding a comment that actually the inference didn't necessarily stack up.

But in any case you and I were both wrong, because GP has said he didn't recall suggesting either. I'm hoping he will do me the favour of explaining what he was suggesting, as you know I do like to avoid misinterpreting what people post.

Rather like your and your "broadly" non racist friends its easy with vague sentences and obscure meaningless phrases to get the wrong end of the schtick (see what I did there?).

Still i do get a laugh at the fact that you jump to the wrong conclusion on most occasions when responding to a post of mine.

but not on this occasion I would suggest? Good effort on being upset by two of us at the same time though

[swaledale]

but not on this occasion I would suggest? Good effort on being upset by two of us at the same time though

Oh please! Don't flatter yourself! neither of you upset me or indeed bother me in anyway, I mean your cyphers on a ****ing internet forum, which I visit when I've nothing better to do! Neither of you enter my consciousness on any meaningful level!


Of the two GP tends to be more intelligible, and generally is like me being mischievous and light hearted in his joshing.

You on the other hand are a mendacious devious lying little ****e, whose attempts to conceal your true character fail every time. I've more concern for the dog **** on my shoe than you or what you choose to think or post!