Labour lies.

[Psaw]

Labour has said that Shell has had profits of 147 billion. The real figure is 40 billion.

All energy is taxed to the tune of 65 per cent. That is tax at Labour levels, and still not good enough. And now griff etc will deny those figures, now you understand why i will oppose for ever, Labour, as a pox on this country.

[6EQUJ5]

Labour has said that Shell has had profits of 147 billion.

Source? [Labour Party web site? Physical newspaper quote? Newspaper web site quote? Recorded television / radio program available?]

[griff]

Yeah, source.

[C_U_N_T]

Given the events since 24th July 2019 it is somewhat amusing to read that the Labour Party tells lies.

[Psaw]

If i tell you where i got that, you will just denigrate anything i say. There will be no progress to truth, just a never ending war. The upshot of that is that it can only end in separation.

As always. If it ever comes to civil war, you boys will lose, as usual.

Most of your troops will wear pink pants, smoke dope and sleep with each other. And dream of living in Cuba.

My lot will be dressed in black, and leave destruction in its wake.

Then they will be re stabled. Till next time. And freedom will be preserved from your dictatorial loons.

[griff]

Still waiting for that source Frank.

[C_U_N_T]

Psaw
If you have a source, give it to us. If you have a source then provide the url. If it is a tv / radio programme we can get it on 'catchup'. If it is on YouTube or anywhere on the internet then give us the URL.

Maybe your 'quoted' figure was real but the figure was an accumulation of years for Shell or an accumulation of the profits of a few companies.

Until you provide a source such that we get the real fact of the accusation of there being a supposed allegation being made then we must regard it as unfounded. There is no escape from this conclusion, no form of words that can justify the accusation of there being a supposed allegation being made. You can either prove that it was made or you cannot do so. Mere bluster counts as nothing.

[griff]

Come on Frank, link. Or is it that you tell more lies than Labour?

[Psaw]

Find out for yourself.

[C_U_N_T]

Psaw
This is a bizarre and illegitimate attempt to switch the burden of proof. You have made an assertion that a claim has been made by Labour. We are saying that there is no evidence of such a claim. So instead you want us to search for the evidence which would prove you to be correct.

Plainly the burden of proof is upon you to produce evidence that you are correct. Until you have produced such evidence then it is perfectly reasonable to dismiss your assertion. Clearly the Labour Party is innocent of your accusation until you can provide evidence that it is guilty. It is entirely a matter for you to provide evidence / proof.