Nature says kaput

[Psaw]

Nature has an effective way of deleting its mistakes, its called extinction. Except with human beings, ably assisted by the Tories who know that its chucking good money after bad. Those that cant float their own boat should sink, its natures way.

On Anglia TV two people, a mother and daughter were shown in a food bank, emptying the shelves, saying they cant afford to eat. They were both obese.

This is abuse, that after telling lies they then ride on the backs of the rich, its their job, they dont want a proper one.

As it is in the north, the Tories spend huge amounts of money on people who, like in the 1800s, should be in a workhouse and forced to earn a living.

Thank god the tories tax the poor, the few who work. Way in excess of the rich. ha ha ha. Sixty per cent of school kids in north norfolk go to school hungry with no breakfast, while the parents buy scotch, gamble, smoke etc.

And do they give a fck. I feed the birds daily, and in the same way, all benefits should be stopped, and a man should walk down streets throwing waste supermarket food into the road. And the poor will live better.

VIVA TORIES.

[C_U_N_T]

On Anglia TV two people, a mother and daughter were shown in a food bank, emptying the shelves, saying they cant afford to eat. They were both obese.

This is abuse, that after telling lies they then ride on the backs of the rich, its their job, they dont want a proper one.

Once again you make an embarrassingly poor case. You cite 2 people abusing a food bank as though this is the norm throughout the UK.

You should find an evening class on how to debate.

[_Stefan_Kuntz]

Thank god the tories tax the poor, the few who work. Way in excess of the rich. ha ha ha.

Some theologists are of the opinion that there is not one Hell for all. They reckon that each wicked person has his/her own individually tailored Hell. Come the day that you arrive it will be in a Hell where you are permanently hungry, there is a bundle of currency worth a billion pounds permanently just out of your reach and Jeremy Corby is lecturing to you.

You may as well cease being religious immediately. It will not be of any advantage to you after the end of your life.

[6EQUJ5]

Nature has an effective way of deleting its mistakes, its called extinction. Except with human beings, ably assisted by the Tories who know that its chucking good money after bad. Those that cant float their own boat should sink, its natures way.

Nature / evolution has no morality. In fact it does not recognise the existence of morality. It does not prioritise intelligence, it prioritises survival whatever that takes, including hunting for survival. In some cases a better claw has gradually occurred, or better legs, or better ears / eyes etc.

When an intelligent civilisation eventually exists it should be a moral entity. The test of how civilised we are is the way we treat those who are weakest.

So we acknowledge nature / evolution as a fact. We do not acknowledge that its cruel aspects should be part of a civilised society.

[Psaw]

No no no no. If we take a moral stance then improvement is not possible. Reproducing faulty genes propogates and reproduces faulty genes. So the smaller, not the bigger claw predominates.

And in current thinking, like socialist thinking, the smaller claw must be protected, even in religious thinking. So an intelligent civilisation must not tolerate smaller claws, it must make sure smaller claws are obliterated. Small claws equal no further reproduction.

The moral stance is therefore to weed out small claws.

And take nescessary action. That is the case isnt it.?

If you look at the evolution of man, the point is proven, over and over again. We used to be small brained apes, now we are big brained apes. Where does morality fit into that? Before we were apes, we were small rodents etc. Why would we want to remain small brained apes or rodents?

The only way to go big is to choose big.

As you say above, acknowledge evolution. I see you as a small claw, therfore you must not be allowed to reproduce, i want your knackers nailed to my front door.

[_Stefan_Kuntz]

No no no no. If we take a moral stance then improvement is not possible. Reproducing faulty genes propogates and reproduces faulty genes. So the smaller, not the bigger claw predominates.

And in current thinking, like socialist thinking, the smaller claw must be protected, even in religious thinking. So an intelligent civilisation must not tolerate smaller claws, it must make sure smaller claws are obliterated. Small claws equal no further reproduction.

The moral stance is therefore to weed out small claws.

And take nescessary action. That is the case isnt it.?

If you look at the evolution of man, the point is proven, over and over again. We used to be small brained apes, now we are big brained apes. Where does morality fit into that? Before we were apes, we were small rodents etc. Why would we want to remain small brained apes or rodents?

The only way to go big is to choose big.

As you say above, acknowledge evolution. I see you as a small claw, therfore you must not be allowed to reproduce, i want your knackers nailed to my front door.

You are only counting wealth as being genetically beneficial to society. Wealth is not genetic. That is an incredibly silly stance. I know people whose families in the past have had wealth but now they do not have it. I also know people whose circumstances are the opposite of that.

Therefor, in your logic of what is best in for our civilisation, those currently in poverty should be left to die. You totally misunderstand the difference that has to apply between nature / evolution and a civilised society. The son / daughter of someone living in poverty may be the person who discovers a cure for cancer. By your standards that person would not be born because you would let the parents die before conception.

[Psaw]

No im not, im suggesting bigger claws are better. Thats bigger of everything, including brains. Wealth, advancement of any kind, space expolration, cancer cures, are dependant on brains not money.

You are a small claw stefan, you have twisted my post. I want your knackers dripping, on my sword.

[_Stefan_Kuntz]

So an intelligent civilisation must not tolerate smaller claws, it must make sure smaller claws are obliterated.

Trying to purify the race according to your specification will never occur Adolf.

[Psaw]

Yes, the nazis promoted eugenics. I am ashamed of myself.