Class act on shirt sponsoring.

[MadAmster]

For the rest of the season we are devoting and donating the front of the shirts to promote the NSPCC. Class move IMO.

[MadAmster]

Maybe our dear neighbours would care to follow suit...

[SithHappens]

Maybe our dear neighbours would care to follow suit...

NSPCI, National society for the protection of cruelty to inbreds??

[MadAmster]

NSPCI, National society for the protection of cruelty to inbreds??

Tricky one that

[SithHappens]

Tricky one that

I know, probably deserve a bunch of sixes for that

[Trickytreesreds]

We should go with "Just Bleat"

[SithHappens]

Considering who your owner is 'just cheat' might be more appropriate 😅

[Trickytreesreds]

Considering who your owner is 'just cheat' might be more appropriate ��

Woah, are you really going to use that?

Please just remind me what's happened over the last 24 months?

offffffffffffffffffffffffside lol

[MadAmster]

Woah, are you really going to use that?

Please just remind me what's happened over the last 24 months?

offffffffffffffffffffffffside lol

We fell foul of using a depreciation method that is perfectly legal under FRS102 (source a UK Bank Manager friend of mine). Boro decided
they didn't like it. An EFL disciplinary committee containing some accountants found us not guilty. On appeal, a committee containing zero accountants found us guilty. As it was an accounting matter, isn't that a tad questionable? Even more so when, after the case, the EFL introduced a rule to prevent that particular depreciation method being used....

We got fined and instructed to change 3 season's accounts which led to the extra 9 point deduction. Would an appeal committee containing accountants have reached a different decision? I suspect they would.

[Trickytreesreds]

We fell foul of using a depreciation method that is perfectly legal under FRS102 (source a UK Bank Manager friend of mine). Boro decided
they didn't like it. An EFL disciplinary committee containing some accountants found us not guilty. On appeal, a committee containing zero accountants found us guilty. As it was an accounting matter, isn't that a tad questionable? Even more so when, after the case, the EFL introduced a rule to prevent that particular depreciation method being used....

We got fined and instructed to change 3 season's accounts which led to the extra 9 point deduction. Would an appeal committee containing accountants have reached a different decision? I suspect they would.

So you're blaming GP and Andy?

MA, word it how you want , MM tried didling everyone, from the tax man to the players themselves.
You got away with it for an extra year at the expense of others.
Own it.