+ Visit Carlisle United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Walsall

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,511
    Quote Originally Posted by _Stefan_Kuntz View Post
    We are f*ucked. I see a big fiscal loss in the year to 30/6/2023 with nobody willing to pay the numerous creditors. The big transfer fee add-ons are long gone, having propped up 1921 for a couple of financial years. Furthermore, Philip Day is now bearing down on 1921. He obviously wants significant repayments of the £2.5 million debt.

    However, we are doing OK in the league so nobody cares. Not caring about the financial situation is a substantial error. 1921 can go insolvent and cease to exist.
    But surely things can only get better now that the Unita Fortior boys have taken the wheel?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,601
    I would swap our situation with Rochdale. Almost certainly both teams will be in League Two next season. Rochdale owe
    f­uck all to any b­astard.

    When will everyone believe the total truth about the Charge? Some folk still say that it is solely on Brunton Park. It states
    that on the title page of the document. But when you actually read the document it is absolutely clear that the Charge is on
    all 1921 assets including money in bank accounts. I have had this verified by a substantially qualified financial professional
    and also Nigel Clibbens confirms that the Charge is on all Carlisle United assets including money in bank accounts.

    Philip Day is no Fred Story. The debt to his Purepay is a real debt that will have to be paid, which is a real problem.

    The genuine value of all 1921's assets is less than the value of the liabilities. 1921 makes serious losses in all years in
    which there are no exceptionals.

    This financial year to 30/6/2023 there is obviously going to be a substantial loss. AJ will not pay it, so 1921 will receive notices of prosecution, even possibly Winding Up Orders. The significant transfer add-ons propped up the finances for a couple of seasons but they did end and have been used up.

    Nevertheless no b­ugger likes to think of this genuine existential crisis for 1921. Nobody ever mentions it.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,511
    Quote Originally Posted by _Stefan_Kuntz View Post
    I would swap our situation with Rochdale. Almost certainly both teams will be in League Two next season. Rochdale owe
    f*uck all to any b*astard.

    When will everyone believe the total truth about the Charge? Some folk still say that it is solely on Brunton Park. It states
    that on the title page of the document. But when you actually read the document it is absolutely clear that the Charge is on
    all 1921 assets including money in bank accounts. I have had this verified by a substantially qualified financial professional
    and also Nigel Clibbens confirms that the Charge is on all Carlisle United assets including money in bank accounts.

    Philip Day is no Fred Story. The debt to his Purepay is a real debt that will have to be paid, which is a real problem.

    The genuine value of all 1921's assets is less than the value of the liabilities. 1921 makes serious losses in all years in
    which there are no exceptionals.

    This financial year to 30/6/2023 there is obviously going to be a substantial loss. AJ will not pay it, so 1921 will receive notices of prosecution, even possibly Winding Up Orders. The significant transfer add-ons propped up the finances for a couple of seasons but they did end and have been used up.

    Nevertheless no b*ugger likes to think of this genuine existential crisis for 1921. Nobody ever mentions it.
    You probably should write to Dan... care of the Trust.

    He may be able to help.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,601
    The Unita F­artior creators have an ongoing record of running the other place unethically.

    Since they got 5 of the 12 CUOSC board memberships there has been no sign of it improving in any way whatsoever.

    It is quite legitimate to regard CUOSC as useless until there is evidence to prove otherwise.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,511
    Quote Originally Posted by _Stefan_Kuntz View Post
    The Unita F*artior creators have an ongoing record of running the other place unethically.

    Since they got 5 of the 12 CUOSC board memberships there has been no sign of it improving in any way whatsoever.

    It is quite legitimate to regard CUOSC as useless until there is evidence to prove otherwise.
    Hard to disagree with that.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •